Daniil Medvedev has offered a different perspective from Carlos Alcaraz on the ongoing debate over the format of Grand Slam matches, admitting that he would personally prefer best-of-three sets. Alcaraz recently defended the traditional best-of-five format, arguing that the longer matches are an important part of what makes the Grand Slams different from other tournaments.
Medvedev, however, said he would choose three sets if given the option, while making clear that he would accept whatever decision is eventually taken. The discussion has centred on proposals to reduce Grand Slam matches to best-of-three sets through the quarterfinals, or potentially for the entire tournament.
The former US Open champion believes such a change could have an impact on the history and identity of the sport’s four biggest tournaments. At the same time, his personal preference is clear, having previously said that he would rather play fewer sets if given the choice.
"I'd rather play three sets. I think it would definitely hurt the history of the Grand Slams. But ever since I was young, I've always said: 'Listen, I'd rather play three sets.’ So if you want my opinion, I would choose to play three."
Medvedev would accept any Grand Slam format
Despite his preference, Medvedev does not appear opposed to the possibility of a format change. The Russian stressed that he can adapt to whatever the sport ultimately decides, meaning his comments are more about his personal preference as a player than a demand for the Grand Slams to change.
“Even though I also think playing five is good, I adapt to whatever is decided. If one day they decide to switch to three sets through the quarterfinals, or even for the entire tournament, it won't bother me. And if five sets are kept, that's fine too.”
Medvedev also pointed to the history of the Masters 1000 tournaments, which were previously played over best-of-five sets on some occasions. While he remembers that format positively, he does not believe there is a need to bring it back.
“It was also fun when the Masters 1000 tournaments were played over five sets, but I don't think that format should be brought back. I'm just a player. I focus on the game. I'll always do my best, no matter how many sets I have to play.”
Daniil Medvedev — Grand Slam finals
| Year | Grand Slam | Opponent | Result | Score |
| 2019 | US Open | Rafael Nadal | Loss | 5–7, 3–6, 7–5, 6–4, 4–6 |
| 2021 | Australian Open | Novak Djokovic | Loss | 5–7, 2–6, 2–6 |
| 2021 | US Open | Novak Djokovic | Win — Title | 6–4, 6–4, 6–4 |
| 2022 | Australian Open | Rafael Nadal | Loss | 6–2, 7–6(7–5), 4–6, 4–6, 5–7 |
| 2023 | US Open | Novak Djokovic | Loss | 3–6, 6–7(5–7), 3–6 |
| 2024 | Australian Open | Jannik Sinner | Loss | 6–3, 6–3, 4–6, 4–6, 3–6 |
Medvedev carries momentum after Hangzhou title
The Grand Slam discussion came as Medvedev continued to build momentum following his title run in Hangzhou. The Russian captured his 24th career title by defeating Andrey Rublev in the final, adding another trophy to a season in which he has been working his way back towards the upper end of the ATP rankings.
Medvedev said he was feeling physically strong despite playing two tournaments in succession, helped by having an extra day between his Hangzhou final and his next match. He also said his tennis was in a good place as he looked ahead to the remainder of the season.
“I feel great. I was a bit lucky to play two days after the final, not the next day. So I feel really good. I felt good physically today, and with my tennis as well. I'm looking ahead with enthusiasm.”
Read also
The Hangzhou title also provided Medvedev with a reminder of the feeling that comes with winning, although he acknowledged the difference between claiming a smaller ATP title and lifting a Grand Slam trophy.
“The atmosphere on court is exactly the same. For example, when I won the US Open: you feel relief when you win the last point. In fact, every time, it was with an out-wide serve and the opponent putting the ball into the net.”
“Hangzhou is a smaller tournament than the US Open, but the atmosphere is pretty similar. It's a relief; it's a pleasant feeling. Of course, what comes after is different when you win a Grand Slam compared to a 250.”
Cristhián AvilaTennis Journalist
Cristhián Ávila is a tennis journalist based in Santiago, Chile, and has been part of the TennisUpToDate team since early 2023. He covers the ATP and WTA Tours as well as all four Grand Slams, producing breaking news, match reports, analysis, and regular liveblogs from major tournaments.
His reporting combines statistical analysis with clear explanation, helping readers understand tactical developments, player form, and broader storylines across the tour. Working fluently in both Spanish and English, Cristhián collaborates with an international editorial team and contributes to comprehensive global coverage. As part of his work, he has conducted interviews and media interactions with leading figures in the sport, including Caroline Wozniacki and John McEnroe.
In his journalism, Cristhián places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. His coverage is grounded in research, context, and direct engagement with professional tennis.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- No more bullshit "Wildcards" to these two. Qualify like everyone else -- there will be cameras there, too. Time to scream... WTF ????!!!!
mandoist29-09-2026 - Let's not BS the general public -- Sabalenka started showing cracks in her game last season. Her losses and near-losses started at about the same time she began being distracted by Fame (constant Selfies, making TV commercials, magazine shoots, endless Social Media nonsense, etc., etc.) One would think even Saba could recognize the parallels with others who failed before her -- Raducanu, Giorgi, Bouchard to name a few.mandoist25-09-2026
- Gross!! Hey Raducanu, Giorgi, and Bouchard -- reserve a seat at your Social Media Selfie table for Saba + Naomi. They're heading in your direction soon enough.mandoist24-09-2026
- And then these same players will complain about how lengthy their season’s were and need more time-off. I’m all for more tennis but the amount of tennis we get now is actually kind of crazy! We all need a break, especially the players.DaveyWavey23-09-2026
- You should do a comparison article for "different kinds of justice" the courts decide for tennis players. I can think of at least three players who received very small bans of a few months, however Tara Moore has been fighting for her literal survival the past few years. It seems odd considering she is not a "name" player, unlike the other cases.DaveyWavey22-09-2026
- PRIZE MONEY & POINTS Winner - $185,500 Finalist - $114,500 Semi-Finalist - $66,003 Quarter-Finalist - $35,000 Round of 16 - $18,045 Round of 32 - $13,005 Winner - 500 Finalist - 325 Semi-Finalist - 195 Quarter-Finalist - 108 Round of 16 - 60 Round of 32 - 1DaveyWavey20-09-2026
- Pegula withdrew from this Singapore event
tennishappens19-09-2026 - Serena Williams chose her tournaments. It's not such a bad idea.MuswellHillbilly17-09-2026
- This child is just too fragile. Step away from tennis for a year. Get healthy, get fit; train hard;ranking be damned, and come back as strong contender. Anisimova did it. So can Emma.Rapunzel17-09-2026
- Double standards, what can be said!? Venus is p**ing on media and public. Can't face defeat. Cowerdness! Shouldn't be given any other wild cards ever. That's gross disrespect.DragosJacob16-09-2026
Loading