Daniil Medvedev has offered a different perspective from Carlos Alcaraz on the ongoing debate over the format of Grand Slam matches, admitting that he would personally prefer best-of-three sets. Alcaraz recently defended the traditional best-of-five format, arguing that the longer matches are an important part of what makes the Grand Slams different from other tournaments.
Medvedev, however, said he would choose three sets if given the option, while making clear that he would accept whatever decision is eventually taken. The discussion has centred on proposals to reduce Grand Slam matches to best-of-three sets through the quarterfinals, or potentially for the entire tournament.
The former US Open champion believes such a change could have an impact on the history and identity of the sport’s four biggest tournaments. At the same time, his personal preference is clear, having previously said that he would rather play fewer sets if given the choice.
"I'd rather play three sets. I think it would definitely hurt the history of the Grand Slams. But ever since I was young, I've always said: 'Listen, I'd rather play three sets.’ So if you want my opinion, I would choose to play three."
Medvedev would accept any Grand Slam format
Despite his preference, Medvedev does not appear opposed to the possibility of a format change. The Russian stressed that he can adapt to whatever the sport ultimately decides, meaning his comments are more about his personal preference as a player than a demand for the Grand Slams to change.
“Even though I also think playing five is good, I adapt to whatever is decided. If one day they decide to switch to three sets through the quarterfinals, or even for the entire tournament, it won't bother me. And if five sets are kept, that's fine too.”
Medvedev also pointed to the history of the Masters 1000 tournaments, which were previously played over best-of-five sets on some occasions. While he remembers that format positively, he does not believe there is a need to bring it back.
“It was also fun when the Masters 1000 tournaments were played over five sets, but I don't think that format should be brought back. I'm just a player. I focus on the game. I'll always do my best, no matter how many sets I have to play.”
Daniil Medvedev — Grand Slam finals
| Year | Grand Slam | Opponent | Result | Score |
| 2019 | US Open | Rafael Nadal | Loss | 5–7, 3–6, 7–5, 6–4, 4–6 |
| 2021 | Australian Open | Novak Djokovic | Loss | 5–7, 2–6, 2–6 |
| 2021 | US Open | Novak Djokovic | Win — Title | 6–4, 6–4, 6–4 |
| 2022 | Australian Open | Rafael Nadal | Loss | 6–2, 7–6(7–5), 4–6, 4–6, 5–7 |
| 2023 | US Open | Novak Djokovic | Loss | 3–6, 6–7(5–7), 3–6 |
| 2024 | Australian Open | Jannik Sinner | Loss | 6–3, 6–3, 4–6, 4–6, 3–6 |
Medvedev carries momentum after Hangzhou title
The Grand Slam discussion came as Medvedev continued to build momentum following his title run in Hangzhou. The Russian captured his 24th career title by defeating Andrey Rublev in the final, adding another trophy to a season in which he has been working his way back towards the upper end of the ATP rankings.
Medvedev said he was feeling physically strong despite playing two tournaments in succession, helped by having an extra day between his Hangzhou final and his next match. He also said his tennis was in a good place as he looked ahead to the remainder of the season.
“I feel great. I was a bit lucky to play two days after the final, not the next day. So I feel really good. I felt good physically today, and with my tennis as well. I'm looking ahead with enthusiasm.”
Read also
The Hangzhou title also provided Medvedev with a reminder of the feeling that comes with winning, although he acknowledged the difference between claiming a smaller ATP title and lifting a Grand Slam trophy.
“The atmosphere on court is exactly the same. For example, when I won the US Open: you feel relief when you win the last point. In fact, every time, it was with an out-wide serve and the opponent putting the ball into the net.”
“Hangzhou is a smaller tournament than the US Open, but the atmosphere is pretty similar. It's a relief; it's a pleasant feeling. Of course, what comes after is different when you win a Grand Slam compared to a 250.”
Cristhián AvilaTennis Journalist
Cristhián Ávila is a tennis journalist based in Santiago, Chile, and has been part of the TennisUpToDate team since early 2023. He covers the ATP and WTA Tours as well as all four Grand Slams, producing breaking news, match reports, analysis, and regular liveblogs from major tournaments.
His reporting combines statistical analysis with clear explanation, helping readers understand tactical developments, player form, and broader storylines across the tour. Working fluently in both Spanish and English, Cristhián collaborates with an international editorial team and contributes to comprehensive global coverage. As part of his work, he has conducted interviews and media interactions with leading figures in the sport, including Caroline Wozniacki and John McEnroe.
In his journalism, Cristhián places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. His coverage is grounded in research, context, and direct engagement with professional tennis.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- I, like writer of this wonderful article, also picked Noskova to win this entire thing. I would love it if she and Andreeva are in the final.Rapunzel12-11-2026
- "Priorities", Saba... spend less time in front of cameras, anti-Social Media, selfies and back to Tennis.
mandoist12-11-2026 - Tell this to Andreeva!mandoist12-11-2026
- Andreeva with 11 games in a row to add to Saba's downward spiral issue !!! Personal feelings aside... Jess Pegula may want to reassess her evaluation of Mirra's abilities.mandoist12-11-2026
- I predicted whenthe list was finalised that Linda Noskova would win the WTA Finals and her matches against Gauff and Kostyuk prove that. She is the best (underrated) player in the world!Rapunzel11-11-2026
- Either Lena has a chronic internal ailment (i.e., colitis, enteritis, Crohn's, or some type of lower abdomen issue) -- or she is once again dealing with 'Vukovitis'. Mental stress can indeed cause lower body pains. No matter... whatever is truly going on sucks. "Virus" excuse is getting a bit old -- and often -- at this point.mandoist09-11-2026
- Ironically, Martina became a U.S. Citizen about the same time as the Orange Convicted Felon & Abuser was just beginning on his road to losing all Daddy's Millions!!mandoist09-11-2026
- "Another fresh start is in the cards." Thanks for the Humor!! I'm guessing this is the minimum one can do to keep all your sponsors hanging-on in perpetuity?mandoist09-11-2026
- Vukov is doing this to Lena... AGAIN!!!!! WTA's autonomous collective should be dismantled for allowing Vukov to re-emerge from his hand-slapping suspension. Just ask WTA employees how that's been going lately as they witness his continued verbal abuses. Women's Pro Tennis should start over.mandoist08-11-2026
- Can't help but suspect Vukov is back to his old self again. Thank you, WTA. Perhaps you can give them a "Battling Couple of the Year Award 2026" ??mandoist08-11-2026
