The USTA wants to support sexual assault victims but wants important evidence kept out of a trial and doesn’t want Pam Shriver testifying. U.S. Tennis Association try to persuade judge to prohibit key evidence in sexual abuse lawsuit theathletic.com/5308772/2024/0…
USTA in hot water, accused of trying to prohibit key evidence in sexual abuse lawsuit in attempt to dismiss Pam Shriver case
WTASunday, 03 March 2024 at 11:00
The USTA (United States Tennis Association) has landed in hot water after being accused of dismissing key testimony in a sexual abuse lawsuit.
Pam Shriver testified at a seven-hour disposition last April in support of Kylie McKenzie, who filed a lawsuit against the USTA for failing to protect her from sexual abuse. McKenzie had accused her coach Anibal Aranda, of touching her inappropriately as a teenager.
In a filing this week, however, it was revealed the USTA are attempting to persuade the judge presiding over the case to dismiss Shriver's testimony as inadmissible and irrelevant. They say Shriver had no direct knowledge of McKenzie's case.
The New York based organisation is also having to reject claims that Shriver, a 22-time doubles Grand Slam winner, was advised not to speak too much about her own experiences with sexual abuse and keep a distance from McKenzie's lawyer.
One of McKenzie's lawyers told The Athletic: "Here is what happened. Staciellen Mischel (USTA's Deputy Chief Legal Officer) cautioned Shriver against speaking out about her personal experience of sexual abuse as a young tennis player, including ‘warning’ Shriver against speaking with Ms. McKenzie’s counsel in this case.
"Mischel issued that warning soon after Shriver came forward publicly about the sexual misconduct she experienced as a young tennis star, and soon after Shriver and Ms. McKenzie became acquainted over their shared experiences of abuse. Shriver testified that she interpreted this conversation as a warning from USTA: ‘don’t say too much.' Evidence that defendants attempted to silence victims can be interpreted by a jury as evidence of gross negligence."
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- LOL.MrAndreeva10-05-2024
- My money is simply on fatigue. She's not the compact 'muscle-man'-type like perhaps Sabalenka, Swiatek or Sakkari. She's a player desperately longing for some kind of Djokovic rhythm. She should skip lots to win more majors. And the rumour I thought wasn't it Long Covid?MrAndreeva10-05-2024
- If there is some other reason, like exhaustion or self-preservation by not playing in consecutive tourneys, then simply say so. There's no shame in self preservation. Since the WTA obviously does not seriously consider a player's physical and mental stress as they schedule back-to-back majors, it's okay to adhere to such a healthy agenda and admit it. The illness thing is kind of suspect at this point; if only because of the timing pattern.
mandoist10-05-2024 - So, Elena Rybakina has again withdrawn due to illness (in Rome). Fans are concerned if this is truly a gastrointestinal issue. Why the secrecy? Is it truly an illness causing these withdrawals? It may be helpful -- even encouraging -- for others whom also suffer whatever illness is ongoing here to know what she is dealing with; and how. A form of Colitis? Ulcers? What's up? Timing has been last minute. It's a bummer all around.mandoist10-05-2024
- Tennis is ridiculous to maintain the tradition of silence. If they can play in open courts like Rome with all the noise from each court they surely could survive cheering, etc., during play (i.e., a singles match with only a 2 meter fence between them and a men's doubles -- and very loud noise from each side).mandoist10-05-2024
