"Some players are just so fake" – Tensions rise during Ostapenko's Doubles Match in Abu Dhabi
WTA
During a doubles quarter-final match at the Abu Dhabi 500, tensions flared between Jelena Ostapenko, Ellen Perez, Timea Babos, and Nicole Melichar-Martinez. The controversial moment, though not captured on TV or mentioned by commentators, quickly gained traction on social media, emphasizing the intensity of the situation.
Ostapenko and Perez secured a 6-4, 6-4 victory to advance to the semi-finals. However, the most talked-about moment of the match came during a changeover, where an exchange between the players escalated tensions.
As the players switched sides, Babos and Melichar-Martinez were set to proceed first when Ostapenko moved ahead, causing them to halt abruptly. This seemingly minor action led to a verbal exchange that added an extra layer of controversy to the match.
Babos and Perez Speak Out
Babos took to Instagram to express her frustration about the situation, indirectly calling out her opponent’s lack of respect.
"Some players are just sooo fake and disrespectful. I don't care how good they are or how well they hit the ball; they just have to have respect and manners."
Perez also gave her take on X (formerly Twitter), clarifying her perspective on what happened.
"On one of the changeovers, we got up to switch sides, and Niki and Timea were about to go first, and [Jelena Ostapenko] went, and I guess it made Timea stop and wait. As we were switching sides, Timea said, ‘Yeah, you're welcome.’ Then from there, Jelena was fired up with ‘C'mons.’ That’s all, honestly."
Ostapenko's History of Controversy
This is not the first time Ostapenko has found herself at the center of controversy. The Latvian player has been involved in several on-court disputes, with previous incidents in Doha and Brisbane drawing criticism for her behaviour.
Read also
In 2024, after a loss to Victoria Azarenka in Doha, Ostapenko engaged in a heated dispute with the umpire. A similar situation occurred at the 2025 Brisbane International, where her on-court demeanor sparked further criticism.
Despite the latest controversy, Ostapenko and Perez maintained their focus and went on to win their semi-final match, moving one step closer to securing the title in Abu Dhabi.
Jelena Ostapenko taking over the net on deciding point look at her go 🔥🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/tp7z8lIryb
— Owen (@kostekcanu) February 7, 2025
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Bencic is all business right now. If Rybakina is the ice queen, then Bencic is Antarctica—colder, sharper, and seemingly unstoppable. 🔥❄️MrAndreeva07-02-2025
- Creepy.
mandoist07-02-2025 - Ouch!!mandoist07-02-2025
- they need to change the rules on the WTA to limit wildcards more effectively like they have on the ATPSososo06-02-2025
- This is just getting beyond ridiculous!! Not to mention unsportsmanlike and unfair to serious up & coming contenders.mandoist06-02-2025
- No, writer, we were not "stunned". If you knew your business you would have been aware of her statement last weekend re: her knee and retirement. The main take-away here is that Simona went out on her own terms. She surely wanted to play again after WTA & ITIA screwed her out of her final productive seasons. Personally, I believed she was going to make this announcement when I saw the President and his family in their box seats. Good for Simone -- now she can move on to other things as she said she would.mandoist04-02-2025
- It sounds seriously absurd that in Davis Cup, (unlike Grand Slams such as the Aus Open), medical time outs off court with the medical staff are not allowed?? I mean, if this was an Aus Open match, and the same thing happened to Gurin then, he would have been able to go off court for official medical time out and make an informed decision whether to resume the match or retire. How come such conditions do not apply in Davis Cup?? I mean, there with Davis Cup, it is even more like a soccer match or basketball game in that teams are playing. And so as with those, it ought to be the case in tennis that if a player needs serious medical time out, then one of the other team mates ought to substitute and each team needs to have stand-ins or understudies in case substitution is needed which will be rare but as we can see here, this kind of circumstance fits. But even if the teams do not go down the road of subbing other team mates in, in case of a health issue like the one which played out here, at least, as in the Aus Open and other Grand Slams, there ought to be time-outs with the health professionals and at the conclusion of these time-outs, the particular decision that has been reached between them and the player needs to be taken on board by the umpire. PERIOD.
Sueiyin04-02-2025 - "If Novak did this, he would be defaulted for life. WTF." 🤣 WTF sounds like What Tennis Fury?! What Tennis Flurry??! I mean, se-rious-ly, it was actually the unfairness of the silly umpire's decision that is the issue here! Further, how come it was Gurin & his team who got disqualified? If this kind of thing happens in soccer, it would be the other guy getting the yellow or red card! Because after all, it was the Belgian who's foul it was so why then penalize the opponents for something they didn't instigate? Fouls in both basketball and soccer are read as a hinderance that has been caused by the player who INITIALLY instigated the hinderance. In this case, okay, it is tennis, but while the precise rules are different to either soccer or basketball, the same type of recognition as to whoever instigates a hinderance should apply, and in this case, it was the Belgian player.Sueiyin04-02-2025
- Medvedev talking to his form here. "Some actual deep problem." 🤣😂🤣MrAndreeva03-02-2025
- "Hopefully, the team around her will help... " Actually, the lack thereof seems to have been part of the problem(s). Another possibility is that, while dealing with legitimate surgeries, withdrawing, and otherwise passing on events, the competition has stepped-up in intensity while she was busy with traveling, photo shoots, and TV commercials.mandoist03-02-2025
