If we're keeping score for extended off-court breaks since the second set, it's now 1-1 between Iga Swiatek and Danielle Collins This all seems far, far from ideal
Swiatek-Collins off-court breaks turn heads, Navratilova recalls 'the old times'
WTAThursday, 01 August 2024 at 19:30
Martina
Navratilova expressed her disappointment with the long off-court breaks taken
by Iga Swiatek and Danielle Collins during their clash at the Olympic Games.
The 18-time Grand Slam champion compared both players to her own career,
highlighting her pride in virtually never taking a break across more than 1,700
career matches.
The
Swiatek-Collins encounter was arguably the most heated match of Paris 2024. The
match ended with Collins retiring in the third set, with the score at 6-1, 2-6,
4-1 in favor of the five-time Grand Slam champion.
Navratilova slams extended off-court breaks
From the
outset, things were tense on Court Suzanne Lenglen. In just the third game,
Collins hit the World No. 1 with a powerful shot to the stomach, taking Swiatek
a few seconds to recover. Later, Swiatek requested a bathroom break, and the
American complained to the chair umpire about the time the Polish player took.
Similarly,
Collins took a medical timeout as she began to experience physical discomfort.
Once the match concluded, Collins approached her opponent and was seen sharing
some tense words with her rival: "I told Iga she didn't have to be
insincere about my injury," the American later explained in a press
conference.
Iga Swiatek at 2024 Roland Garros.
Social
media erupted with comments supporting one player or the other in the conflict.
Journalist Christopher Clarey criticized the long breaks taken by both players:
"If we're keeping score for extended off-court breaks since the second
set, it's now 1-1 between Iga Swiatek and Danielle Collins. This all seems far,
far from ideal," he said.
Former
World No. 1 Martina Navratilova joined the discussion on social media,
responding to the tweet by mentioning her own career: "Guess how many
times I went to the bathroom in my whole career in some 1,700 matches?"
Navratilova said.
Guess how many times I went to the bathroom in my whole career in some 1700 matches?
Back in 2022, Clarey recalled the historic duel between Venus Williams and Arantxa Sanchez
Vicario in 1994, when the Spaniard took a long toilet break as a strategy to
disrupt the 14-year-old, who was close to achieving an incredible victory
against the World No. 2 at that time:
"Arantxa
Sanchez Vicario weighs in on her unsympathetic portrayal in 'King Richard.'
Says depiction of her as 'bad, super bad' when she was losing 2-6, 1-3 to
14-year-old Venus in her WTA debut event was 'totally incorrect.'
"We
never took bathroom breaks back then and certainly not as a ploy,"
Navratilova responded.
Arantxa Sanchez Vicario weighs in on her unsympathetic portrayal in "King Richard". Says depiction of her as "bad, super bad" when she was losing 2-6, 1-3 to 14-year-old Venus in her WTA debut event was "totally incorrect" marca.com/tenis/2022/04/…
AFAIK, it didn’t happen at all. We never took bathroom breaks back then and certainly not as a ploy…
Arantxa Sanchez Vicario weighs in on her unsympathetic portrayal in "King Richard". Says depiction of her as "bad, super bad" when she was losing 2-6, 1-3 to 14-year-old Venus in her WTA debut event was "totally incorrect" marca.com/tenis/2022/04/…
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- FYI: The term 'snub' is a much overused verb by writers of sensationalist rags. [SNUB: rebuff, ignore, or spurn disdainfully]. That is not the definition of what is going on with frequent withdrawals from tournaments.
mandoist16-09-2024 - No offence, Mr. Lloyd, but where have you been the past two years?? How long have you been a tennis fan? This 'article' may be informative for newbies or fair-weather tennis observers but the majority of fans know the root of the multiple issues within WTA. The #1 issue being the subject of health & well-being which has been (or has attempted to be) addressed with the WTA Elitist council members last season. WTA was extremely dismissive of players' concerns and opposed to such a meeting. Eventually giving-in due to publicity and allowed selective players only -- no rep's, no medical personnel, and no team members. The meeting was a farce as WTA soon after that released an even more hectic schedule... with mandatory tourneys! Guess they weren't taking notes?? BTW: There is a lot missing from this piece concerning "withdrawals". No writer has yet taken the jump to get behind the scenes and dig at the problems -- obvious organizational problems. IMO, the top two issues are WTA's lack of proper attention to health & well-being of its Money-Makers; and Financial Greed. Tip to Mr. Lloyd: there is no "snubbing" when these players withdraw. These women have to take such measures as withdrawing from a tourney, and occasional time-off from the circuit, to protect themselves -- because WTA refuses to take any measures at all (although not allowing matches until sunrise is a start). Surely you can do better than point fingers at players. The finger-pointing should be directed entirely at WTA (and ATP). Be a true journalist, Mr. Lloyd, and research them!!mandoist16-09-2024
- Uh-oh.... Now Raducanu is being forced to compete! Let's see who withdraws next... I wonder??mandoist15-09-2024
- And this is such a shock to WTA?? How many times are they (WTA & ATP) going to keep stepping in their own s*** ???mandoist15-09-2024
- They can go down together!mandoist15-09-2024
