One of the most embarrassing moments of this #USOpen. If it’s for this… then don’t use VAR at all. Kalinskaya was in shock as we all would be.
(VIDEO) Anna Kalinskaya left stunned after embarrassing double bounce controversy as call upheld despite use of VAR
WTASunday, 01 September 2024 at 20:53
Anna Kalinskaya through the night was defeated at the US Open in the third round by Beatriz Haddad Maia. But instead of their clash which was a highlight of the night session, it was video replay technology again in the spotlight.
Kalinskaya was left stunned and fuming as a controversial double bounce was not called at the 2024 US Open despite the use of video technology with a massive blunder by those watching the footage.
After the US hard court swing had its fair share of video replay issues including for Taylor Fritz and Jack Draper in particular, the use of VAR was welcome. However, it showed that it certainly needs some work already with this contentious call.
The Brazilian chased down a shot by Kalinskaya and appeared to have returned the ball on a double bounce. However after the point was awarded, Kalinskaya called for VAR. The World No.21 was right as it was revealed that Haddad Maia indeed failed to reach the ball.
However these calls were in vain as the umpire ruled that it was legal. Kalinskaya as expected was fuming and Haddad Maia did not paint herself in the best light by not getting involved. She chose not to concede the point despite watching the replay. The umpire upheld the call leaving Kalinskaya to lament a crucial point going the other way.
Another damning call in the debate for or against video technology. Welcomed prior to the tournaments, some will wonder why did they bother.
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Or the NFL moves up a week ;-)
AceOfBase14-09-2024 - They need to stop having the USO finals weekend compete with NFL opening weekend. Tennis sucks at scheduling!
smurphie92413-09-2024 - Anti-Social media has no guardrails... and the Lowest Common Denominators are free to demean and denounce anyone, any time; and obviously do so on a daily basis. Why? Because thus far, given the lack of oversight (much less control) over these public immorally bankrupt entities, there is little-to-no possibility of legal repercussion.
mandoist11-09-2024 - Bitterness will always surface the more one cannot resist the urge to spew personal feelings. Unless this woman is running for office she doesn't get -- nor deserve -- the opportunity to literally reinvent what she plainly said the first time. She's no longer a tennis player, does not represent the sport, and should therefor refrain from meaningless drivel and snottyass remarks about her former colleagues.mandoist11-09-2024
- How is it not clear to pro tennis Elitists in charge that flooding the sport with more and more tournaments is NOT the answer? Such decisions made through PURE GREED disguised as "offering more up & coming players a chance to compete". This sport is, at the very foundation, a Business. Any corporate entity should know by now that introducing too many 'franchises' to a limited market is counterproductive to say the very least? And let us not forget the Top Athletes cannot be everywhere week-to-week no matter how much money the tourneys throw at them. Therefor you get a situation such as the US Open missing out on the Best-of-the-Best. Simple economics -- and definitely common sense -- seems to be lost on the WTA/ATP 'experts' in the offices.mandoist11-09-2024
