Carlos Alcaraz avenges last US Open and defeats Botic Van de Zandschulp to advance in Rotterdam
ATP
Carlos Alcaraz arrived at his debut at the ABN AMRO Open Rotterdam 2025 after reaching the quarterfinals of the Australian Open and falling in a four-set battle against former world No. 1 Noval Djokovic. In the beginning of his journey in the Netherlands he defeated the number 84, Botic Van de Zandschulp - the Spaniard's tormentor in Flushing Meadows - in a hard-fought match by 7-6(3), 3-6, 6-1.
Alcaraz has made some modifications to his schedule and this year he changed the South American tour for tournaments closer to home. Rotterdam is only his second competition in this 2025 in which Alcaraz will have to balance well the amount of championships played and thus conserve the necessary energy to reach the end of the season better than last year.
Read also
Botic Van de Zandschulp is already a familiar sight for the Spaniards. Not only did he knock out Alcaraz himself in the second round of the US Open 2024, but it was the Dutchman who last defeated the iconic Rafael Nadal in the last edition of the Davis Cup. The 29-year-old's tennis has proven to be quite a handful, especially on fast courts.
Alcaraz started his presentation in the Netherlands looking for a new victory against the Dutchman. Currently Van de Zandschulp is 1-2 but it was he who had the last smile. Before the US Open Carlitos had defeated him in Basel and at the Australian Open in 2022 and 2021 respectively.
First set
The first set was extremely strange with both players giving up their serve several times, being much more comfortable from the rest.
Alcaraz lost his serve in the third game and instantly regained it, only to be broken again in the next game. Three consecutive breaks and an erratic first set for both. The Dutchman held the lead until he had to serve for the set. Even with a set point in his favor, Van de Zandschulp could not withstand the pressure and the Spaniard evened things up at 5;
Later in the tie break, Carlitos improved his serve, played very well the points with his serve and marked the differences to take the first set by 7-6(3).
Second Set
The second set saw the Dutchman playing much more determined and confident. After an even start in which both exchanged break opportunities, van de Zandschulp struck first in the sixth game, taking advantage of a drop in the second serve of the two-time Wimbledon champion. He would win only 4 of the ten points played on his second serve in the whole set. The one break advantage was enough and Van de Zandschulp managed to close out the set 6-3.
Third Set
The number 84 of the world ranking came loaded with motivation to the decisive set, putting a lot of pressure on Carlitos from the return, even having a break point. Unfortunately for the Dutchman, the missed chances throughout the match would be a constant theme and everything that does not kill Alcaraz, makes him stronger.
The Spaniard broke in game 2 and took a 3-0 lead after holding serve. From that moment on Alcaraz would not look back, dominating all his service games and improving what he had done in the previous sets in terms of effectiveness with his first and second serves. Finally Carlitos took the decisive set with great clarity by 6-1 and is in the third round of the tournament.
His next opponent will be the winner of the match between the Italian Andrea Vavassori and the newly crowned Open Occitanie champion Felix Auger-Aliassime.
Carlos fights through 💪@carlosalcaraz takes revenge on his US Open loss to Van de Zandshculp with a 7-6 3-6 6-1 win in Rotterdam!#abnamroopen pic.twitter.com/gXCAL31dz2
— Tennis TV (@TennisTV) February 4, 2025
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- No, writer, we were not "stunned". If you knew your business you would have been aware of her statement last weekend re: her knee and retirement. The main take-away here is that Simona went out on her own terms. She surely wanted to play again after WTA & ITIA screwed her out of her final productive seasons. Personally, I believed she was going to make this announcement when I saw the President and his family in their box seats. Good for Simone -- now she can move on to other things as she said she would.
mandoist04-02-2025 - It sounds seriously absurd that in Davis Cup, (unlike Grand Slams such as the Aus Open), medical time outs off court with the medical staff are not allowed?? I mean, if this was an Aus Open match, and the same thing happened to Gurin then, he would have been able to go off court for official medical time out and make an informed decision whether to resume the match or retire. How come such conditions do not apply in Davis Cup?? I mean, there with Davis Cup, it is even more like a soccer match or basketball game in that teams are playing. And so as with those, it ought to be the case in tennis that if a player needs serious medical time out, then one of the other team mates ought to substitute and each team needs to have stand-ins or understudies in case substitution is needed which will be rare but as we can see here, this kind of circumstance fits. But even if the teams do not go down the road of subbing other team mates in, in case of a health issue like the one which played out here, at least, as in the Aus Open and other Grand Slams, there ought to be time-outs with the health professionals and at the conclusion of these time-outs, the particular decision that has been reached between them and the player needs to be taken on board by the umpire. PERIOD.
Sueiyin04-02-2025 - "If Novak did this, he would be defaulted for life. WTF." 🤣 WTF sounds like What Tennis Fury?! What Tennis Flurry??! I mean, se-rious-ly, it was actually the unfairness of the silly umpire's decision that is the issue here! Further, how come it was Gurin & his team who got disqualified? If this kind of thing happens in soccer, it would be the other guy getting the yellow or red card! Because after all, it was the Belgian who's foul it was so why then penalize the opponents for something they didn't instigate? Fouls in both basketball and soccer are read as a hinderance that has been caused by the player who INITIALLY instigated the hinderance. In this case, okay, it is tennis, but while the precise rules are different to either soccer or basketball, the same type of recognition as to whoever instigates a hinderance should apply, and in this case, it was the Belgian player.Sueiyin04-02-2025
- Medvedev talking to his form here. "Some actual deep problem." 🤣😂🤣MrAndreeva03-02-2025
- "Hopefully, the team around her will help... " Actually, the lack thereof seems to have been part of the problem(s). Another possibility is that, while dealing with legitimate surgeries, withdrawing, and otherwise passing on events, the competition has stepped-up in intensity while she was busy with traveling, photo shoots, and TV commercials.mandoist03-02-2025
- Ha-ha-ha... Translation: I'll help as long as I don't have to meet in person and endure the ongoing BS"mandoist03-02-2025
- Well said.mandoist03-02-2025
- So tennisuptodate doesn't even make this event a headline on this site? I had to find it hidden here. Not a word about Yastremska trying to ruin Alexandrova's celebration with her postgame actions?? According to WTA regulations, Yastremska has some punishment coming her way for walking-off court, blowing-off postgame rituals with the winner; including no photos, etc.mandoist03-02-2025
- "So while perhaps the big issue of having to wait for a call-up is there, so is the coaching carousel. .." Well, there you go. Emma's 'career' in one precise sentence. Sponsors bailing-out on her will follow (so far, only Porsche and Dior).mandoist02-02-2025
- Typical narcissistic cynicism of Kyrgios! Very rarely has a decent word to say about anything. He's abusive, jeeringly loud and obnoxious. He needs to be officially called out by both the ATP and ITF for using foul language in public spaces such as social media. The guy's a vampiric hoon who sucks the lifeblood out of tennis by trying to bolster popularity of the good-for-nothing bad boy image. I once admired Kyrgios for his previous good-willed willingness to get honest help for his mental health issues but that all went down the drain once he figured he could reel money in through publicity stunts using the negativity of his problems in such a way as to declare them 'no longer problems' but something which he could become more entangled in just to boost an anti-hero image. Shame on him for turning his back on common human decency and good-willed fraternity. Instead he opts to make a 'hero' out of villany. I'm sorry Nick but u are only doing more harm to yourself in the long run by trying to serve up a bad name for the sport you claim to so proudly represent. Get real mate, tennis is not for hoons, neither is hoon-behaviour the hallmark of sporting integrity. It's an utter disgrace!Sueiyin02-02-2025
