Pavic and Soares advance as we recap the men's doubles matches in Melbourne
ATPThursday, 23 January 2020 at 14:54
Today's men's doubles draw featured 8 matches out of which six went the full distance so plenty of doubles play on display today
Despite today's 8 matches played none of the top 8 seeded doubles were on the court today. Even so, the matches were quite interesting as 6 of them went the full distance. The only pairs that managed to advance to the next round in straight sets were Pavic / Soares who beat Bambridge and McLachlan 7-6(4) 7-5. The other were Ram / Salisbury who beat Evans and Smith 6-1 7-6(3).
Check out the full results here:
  Melbourne | sets | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Steve Johnson/Sam Querrey | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Cheng-Peng Hsieh/Yen-Hsun Lu | 1 | 79 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Mate Pavic/Bruno Soares | 2 | 7 | 7 | ||||||
| Luke Bambridge/Ben Mclachlan | 0 | 64 | 5 | ||||||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Pablo Cuevas/Guido Pella | 2 | 7 | 5 | 6 | |||||
| Jeremy Chardy/Robert Lindstedt | 1 | 5 | 7 | 3 | |||||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Gregoire Barrere/Adrian Mannarino | 2 | 6 | 4 | 6 | |||||
| Ugo Humbert/Frances Tiafoe | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | |||||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Jurgen Melzer/Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 2 | 6 | 6 | 7 | |||||
| Sander Arends/Richard Berankis | 1 | 2 | 72 | 65 | |||||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Rajeev Ram/Joe Salisbury | 2 | 6 | 7 | ||||||
| Daniel Evans/John-Patrick Smith | 0 | 1 | 63 | ||||||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Santiago Gonzalez/Ken Skupski | 2 | 4 | 6 | 7 | |||||
| Soon-Woo Kwon/John Millman | 1 | 6 | 4 | 64 | |||||||
| 23.01.20 | 1st round | Tennys Sandgren/Jack Withrow | 2 | 4 | 7 | 7 | |||||
| Marcelo Demoliner/Matwe Middelkoop | 1 | 6 | 64 | 68 | |||||||
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Players need to STOP TRYING TO JUSTIFY THEIR INCLUSION! They are not ambassadors for women in Saudi Arabia, they are not politicians, and they will never make a difference for females in that 'culture'. This little tennis "tournament" changes nothing. Players were lured by the money, opted to participate, and should just keep their predictable excuses and Women's Freedom Fairy Tales to themselves. Period. Like most things in Life -- one cannot make an argument relating to the Saudi Regime and, at the same time, triple your bank account with their "gifts".
mandoist03-11-2024 - Players need to STOP TRYING TO JUSTIFY THEIR INCLUSION! They are not ambassadors for women in Saudi Arabia, they are not politicians, and they will never make a difference for females in that 'culture'. This little tennis "tournament" changes nothing. Players were lured by the money, opted to participate, and should just keep their predictable excuses and Women's Freedom Fairy Tales to themselves. Period. Like most things in Life -- one cannot make an argument against the Saudi Regime and, at the same time, triple your bank account with their "gifts".mandoist03-11-2024
- Bring 'm on already! Cannot wait.MrAndreeva29-10-2024
- First of all, there is only one laughing emoji in her Insta story and not “several”. Also, you may want to check recent articles which has paparazzi photos of her driving a Porsche🤣Lyca29-10-2024
- Just give her some time to develop without constant scrutinyLyca27-10-2024
