VIDEO: Medvedev's successful dodging of dismissal after fiery foul mouthed outburst at umpire during Wimbledon semi-final
ATPFriday, 12 July 2024 at 17:19
Daniil Medvedev can count himself lucky to still be in the match against Carlos Alcaraz during his Wimbledon semi-final on Friday afternoon after a foul mouthed rant at the umpire gave him a code violation.
Medvedev swore at the chair umpire constantly saying f*** you mouthing it to her in anger. She also discussed it with the tournament supervisor so in reality Medvedev was very lucky to still be in the match albeit at the time of writing, he sits nearly on his way out of the tournament 4-3 down in the fourth set.
Medvedev started off taking a 3-1 lead in the opening set and consolidated on a break to go 5-2 up only for the Spaniard to get one back. But the frustration as Alcaraz chipped away at his lead was palpable as the Spaniard sent in a delightful drop shot. Medvedev rushed to the baseline to reach the ball.
But the umpire deemed in a controversial call that it had bounced twice and Alcaraz got handed the game. This set Medvedev off. He cursed at her and then Eva Asderaki, the umpire called the tournament supervisor. Thankfully for Medvedev, he dodged the default and was let off with a warning. Further actions similar will result in a point and then game penalty. But any other umpire could've easily have thrown him out.
Medvedev will at the time be glad he did as he went on to win the tie-break quite easily from there. Albeit Alcaraz came from a set down to go 2-1 up in sets and now sits on the verge of victory as he aims to back up his Wimbledon title from last year. If he wins, he could face Novak Djokovic again.
Djokovic will face Lorenzo Musetti later this evening for a spot in the final after the Italian ended the run of Taylor Fritz earlier this tournament.
Samuel GillEditor-in-Chief
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of TennisUpToDate.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces across the TennisUpToDate network, playing a central role in the daily operation and development of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has a broad background in tennis media. In his current role, he works closely with editors and writers to ensure coverage meets clear journalistic standards, with particular attention to verification, consistency, and timely updates when new information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- I love WTA matches. Seek them out as much as possible on youtube and other platforms I already subscribe to. With that in mind, I do not wish to pay $$$ to a notoriously slippery subscription conglomerate sports broadcaster (like SkySports) just for the privilege to watch it and the tnt/eurosport/discovery subscription went from $$ to $$$+ annually in a blink of an eye. With ATP I have been begrudgingly paying xyz tennis only channel and try to catch up on slams elsewhere (pubs, youtube with USO later on games are just as enjoyable to watch and a smart move to upload on their official channel) but they don't cover WTA. I tried another Tennis dedicated channel that advertised originally as broadcasting where I live, but turned out, they took the money, but didn't cover the matches (only fluff/filler value documentaries). I don't understand why it is so hard to not lock the live matches to one broadcaster only refusing so many people who are happy to pay for the privilege just not through that one entry point. WTA is so exciting for the last few years and they really should capitalise on it as much as possible. And I know it is somewhat naive talking without knowing the inner works, but not being able to find any WTA other than youtube (and then only highlights mostly) is just so frustrating.JayJay11-09-2026
- Clearly not AI :-)
AceOfBase11-09-2026 - Oh my God!! Does anyone proofread these pages??? Case in point: However, the question mark over the 32-years-old head......???? No! No! No! However, the question mark over the 32-year-old's head...good grief man, hire a proofreader. This article is rife with errors making some sentences very difficult to read. I had to stop. I am a proofreader hence my disgust.Rapunzel10-09-2026
- Iga needs to make a decision whether she wants to continue the sport of tennis or pursue whatever she has going on in her personal life. One can tell that tennis is no longer an interest of hers. She should retire while she is on top, not when she slides to the bottom of the rankings. She has too much talent to look how she does on the court these days. She looks more like a wild card than a champion.crissy09-09-2026
- Looks like tennis has become a part of the American Oligarchy. As usual, Pegula is given a cupcake draw. With all her money, they have to fixed the draws in her favor in order to raised the trophy.crissy09-09-2026
- Huge win for Ben! He needed this. Amazing that Alcaraz took over four months off and still was able to make the QF’s and take Ben to a fifth set tie break! Insane tennis. Tiafoe vs. Shelton should be a good one too. Americans might finally get their US Open Champion after 23 years!DaveyWavey09-09-2026
- No one else would get away with this but these AMERCANS! It’s the US Open!! In America!! But sure, go off American ;)DaveyWavey08-09-2026
- WOW !!! Her comebacks have been intense. She's Baaaaack!
mandoist08-09-2026 - Don't lay this shitshow on "Americans". It is a long-running Ego trip with WTA allowing these two Elitists 'in need of a Camera' illicit Wildcards. If these two clowns want to "perform" -- then play the qualies.mandoist08-09-2026
- Here we go again…. Different rules for Americans! Especially THESE Americans. Yuck!DaveyWavey07-09-2026
Loading
