Former world number one
Andy Roddick has highlighted the
reason behind the dominance of
Aryna Sabalenka in women’s tennis. The 27-year-old
recently lifted her fourth Grand Slam as she successfully managed to defend the
US Open title after beating America’s
Amanda Anisimova in the final in straight
sets with a score of 6-3, 7-6.
The win was an important one for
Sabalenka, who came into
the competition on the back of two heartbreaking defeats in the final of the
Grand Slams in 2025. She first suffered a defeat in the final of the Australian
Open to America’s Madison Keys with a score of 6–3, 2–6, 7–5. Then at the
French Open, Sabalenka lost to another American player, Coco Gauff, with a
score of 6–7(5–7), 6–2, 6–4.
Even at Wimbledon, Sabalenka had an impressive run and
suffered a shocking defeat in the semifinal to Anisimova with a score of 6-4,
4-6, 6-4. The year 2025 became the first in Sabalenka’s career in which she played in the final of three Grand Slams. It is only the second time in Sabalenka’s
career that she managed to play in the semifinal of every Grand Slam in a calendar
year.
Former men’s world number one Roddick, in a recent episode
of his own podcast, explains how Sabalenka remains so consistent while
competing at the highest level in professional tennis. Roddick explained that Sabalenka consistently put herself in a position to achieve greater things, and according to him, once an athlete does it consistently in sports, sooner or later, in most cases, they end up achieving bigger things as well.
Incredible run
“I think the thing with Sabalenka is that are we always
perfect in the biggest moment? No,” he said
while speaking in the Serve with Andy Roddick latest episode. “You hear players say and a
lot of other people ignore that you put yourself in those situations enough and
you are going to figure that out when you are that good. So, the narrative is,
you know, last year she can’t lose and coming into this year, favourite in
every tournament which she is and I have luckily picked her in three events and
then didn’t pick her in the one she won. But yourself in those positions enough,
you are going to figure it out. It doesn’t mean like it there’s this weird
narrative around sports where its like you are either so clutch or you are not.
And there is like no middle like. Yea, you are clutch most of the time, and
this is sports. Like it’s imperfect. It’s matchups, it’s wins. It’s Roland
Garros when it’s blowing 40. It’s Madison Keys that didn’t see a forehand. She
didn’t hit that for a winner. It’s I get nervous because I haven’t won
Wimbledon and I play this big-hitting Anisimova. And then, I go to New York and
I probably have more question marks than when I enter any other event, for the
entire year. And obviously that mean’s I am going to win and clutch up in the
final. No. This is why sports is amazing. Sabalenka continues to put herself in
these positions and if you do it enough, people are going to remember your wins. They are just going to.”
Roddick then went on to explain the moment when he thought
that Sabalenka won the match against Anisimova in the final of the US Open. Roddick stated that he is not sure whether Sabalenka had that particular shot in her armoury three years back, when she was winning a Grand Slam, but in his opinion, that particular shot made Anisimova believe that she was not going to end on the positive side of the result on Saturday.
“The shot that won her this match, that set the patterns,
that let Anisimova know what she couldn’t get away with, Anisimova goes big
outside return straight through the middle,” said Roddick. “Sabalenka has this
like outside the ball like you known when you are trying to throw a 7/10 split,
and you kind of work outside and then in, that shape straight away to the open
court to get Anisimova on the move where it’s not this flat ball. She is not
falling away. It’s this kind of ball that she spun to her forehand. She hit it
six or seven times in like super clutch moments. It’s 15-30, 30-15, but the
pressure is on. The crowd is getting loud. That was the silencer. And it’s weird
when it’s not some big, powerful, grunty situation, where she is screaming at
the end, it doesn’t grasp our attention the same. That ball, that shot, I don’t
thinks he had three years ago. She could win slams with what she had before
because she was so dominant but that ball where she is almost diffusing power
but still redirecting with that like [Jannik] Sinner spin mechanism and margin.
I don’t know if she worked on that specifically, I don’t know if that was a game
plan but she is just fantastic.”