"Very sensitive to criticism and judgment": Chris Evert opens up about positive parenting role on players
WTA
Former world number one Chris Evert has cited the role of positive parenting on players. The 70-year-old is often regarded as one of the greatest players in the history of women’s tennis in the singles category, having won as many as 18 Grand Slam titles.
Evert has been recently quoted in a report where she talked about the role of positive parenting on players. The Florida-born legendary tennis star cited the support received by the former world number one Serena Williams, which, according to her, played a key role in her success. Evert also lamented about not receiving similar support from her parents during her playing days.
"Very sensitive to criticism and judgment,” she said. “Again, trying to navigate that from the age of 15 when I started to be successful worldwide. It's not an easy thing to be famous and successful when you haven't developed your personality or your character yet at 15, 16 years old. I think you see that in every business. Whether it's the movie business or athletes, it's very polarizing. That was challenging. I think that comes a little bit from also not feeling we didn't have, in our day, parents nowadays, because I remember always reading about Richard Williams and all of the tennis parents basically saying, always telling their kids how great they were, and you can be anything you want to be and just totally having positive reinforcement all the time. But again, in our culture, it wasn't that way. It was more like don't do this, don't do that, be a lady in public.”
Serena is regarded as one of the greatest players in the history of women’s tennis in the singles category in the Open era. The former world number one, who retired from the sport in September 2022, finished her playing career with 23 major titles, the most by a women’s player in the Open era in the singles category.
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- "Intensified" ??? Yeah, right. Nothing has changed... nothing has "intensidfied"; only continued.
mandoist10-02-2025 - Bencic is all business right now. If Rybakina is the ice queen, then Bencic is Antarctica—colder, sharper, and seemingly unstoppable. 🔥❄️MrAndreeva07-02-2025
- Creepy.mandoist07-02-2025
- Ouch!!mandoist07-02-2025
- they need to change the rules on the WTA to limit wildcards more effectively like they have on the ATPSososo06-02-2025
- This is just getting beyond ridiculous!! Not to mention unsportsmanlike and unfair to serious up & coming contenders.mandoist06-02-2025
- No, writer, we were not "stunned". If you knew your business you would have been aware of her statement last weekend re: her knee and retirement. The main take-away here is that Simona went out on her own terms. She surely wanted to play again after WTA & ITIA screwed her out of her final productive seasons. Personally, I believed she was going to make this announcement when I saw the President and his family in their box seats. Good for Simone -- now she can move on to other things as she said she would.mandoist04-02-2025
- It sounds seriously absurd that in Davis Cup, (unlike Grand Slams such as the Aus Open), medical time outs off court with the medical staff are not allowed?? I mean, if this was an Aus Open match, and the same thing happened to Gurin then, he would have been able to go off court for official medical time out and make an informed decision whether to resume the match or retire. How come such conditions do not apply in Davis Cup?? I mean, there with Davis Cup, it is even more like a soccer match or basketball game in that teams are playing. And so as with those, it ought to be the case in tennis that if a player needs serious medical time out, then one of the other team mates ought to substitute and each team needs to have stand-ins or understudies in case substitution is needed which will be rare but as we can see here, this kind of circumstance fits. But even if the teams do not go down the road of subbing other team mates in, in case of a health issue like the one which played out here, at least, as in the Aus Open and other Grand Slams, there ought to be time-outs with the health professionals and at the conclusion of these time-outs, the particular decision that has been reached between them and the player needs to be taken on board by the umpire. PERIOD.
Sueiyin04-02-2025 - "If Novak did this, he would be defaulted for life. WTF." 🤣 WTF sounds like What Tennis Fury?! What Tennis Flurry??! I mean, se-rious-ly, it was actually the unfairness of the silly umpire's decision that is the issue here! Further, how come it was Gurin & his team who got disqualified? If this kind of thing happens in soccer, it would be the other guy getting the yellow or red card! Because after all, it was the Belgian who's foul it was so why then penalize the opponents for something they didn't instigate? Fouls in both basketball and soccer are read as a hinderance that has been caused by the player who INITIALLY instigated the hinderance. In this case, okay, it is tennis, but while the precise rules are different to either soccer or basketball, the same type of recognition as to whoever instigates a hinderance should apply, and in this case, it was the Belgian player.Sueiyin04-02-2025
- Medvedev talking to his form here. "Some actual deep problem." 🤣😂🤣MrAndreeva03-02-2025
