Controversy in Rome: Diana Shnaider vs. Jasmine Paolini and the Role of the Crowd

In the quarterfinals of the 2025 Rome WTA 1000, Russia’s Diana Shnaider appeared to be cruising to victory after edging out Italy’s Jasmine Paolini in a tight first-set tiebreak and racing to a 4-0 lead in the second. But a brief rain delay changed the dynamic entirely. The pause allowed Paolini to regroup, and with the home crowd fully behind her, the momentum shifted dramatically. Shnaider, visibly rattled by the increasingly vocal crowd, ended up losing the match — and she did not hide her frustration.

While Paolini credited the rain delay for giving her a chance to receive guidance from her coach and reset mentally, the Russian star experienced the match very differently. Many outlets noted that the home fans were particularly fervent, crossing the line from passionate support into disruptive territory — something that clearly unsettled the World No. 14.

This incident in Rome echoes other recent episodes where fan behavior has come under scrutiny. At the 2025 Madrid Open, for instance, Casper Ruud voiced his displeasure with spectators supporting Francisco Cerúndolo in their semifinal clash.

Each time the Norwegian stepped up to serve, fans would yell and disrupt his rhythm. A visibly irritated Ruud turned to the chair umpire repeatedly, asking: "How many times can a fan interrupt a player before something is done?" He later suggested that players should perhaps be granted a replay of their first serve in such situations, to deter this type of interference. Although he acknowledged that Cerúndolo had done nothing wrong, Ruud emphasized the need for stricter enforcement of fan conduct to protect fair play.

Earlier in the season, at the Miami Open, the Brazilian crowd also made headlines. Rising star João Fonseca described the atmosphere as feeling like “playing in Brazil”, thanks to the overwhelming support from fans. While the cheers boosted the teenager’s energy, some opponents clearly felt the heat. After defeating Fonseca, Alex de Minaur even wrote “Rio Open” on the camera lens, alluding to the electric — and at times overbearing — Brazilian support.

These incidents are part of a broader conversation about the fine line between support, motivation, and disruptive behavior in professional tennis. In a sport where etiquette is shaped as much by tradition as by rulebooks, players often find themselves navigating an additional layer of psychological pressure.

Ultimately, the controversy in Rome serves as another reminder that while passionate crowds are part of what makes tennis compelling, there must be boundaries — to ensure that enthusiasm doesn’t turn into hostility and undermine the integrity of the game.