
The ATP Tour has moved to amend its rules on video review and hindrance following a controversial incident involving Jack Draper and Daniil Medvedev at Indian Wells. The changes come after sustained criticism from players, officials, and commentators over how and when reviews can be used during points.
The controversy unfolded during the quarter-final clash between Draper, the defending champion, and Medvedev, in what had otherwise been a high-level contest. A disputed call late in the match shifted attention away from the tennis itself, raising broader questions about consistency and fairness in officiating.
At the centre of the issue was a hindrance decision made after the conclusion of a point, a scenario that some players have long argued creates ambiguity. The ruling ultimately handed Medvedev a critical advantage at a decisive stage of the second set, influencing the match’s trajectory.
In the days following the match, discussion intensified around the application of video review, particularly whether players should be allowed to challenge decisions after knowing the outcome of a rally. The ATP has now responded with two specific rule changes aimed at addressing those concerns.
Read also
Controversial Draper-Medvedev moment triggers action
The key moment came with the second set finely poised at 5-5. During a rally, Draper raised his arms mid-point in reaction to a line call, appealing to chair umpire Aurélie Tourte. Although the rally continued, the situation was later reviewed, with officials determining that Draper’s gesture constituted a hindrance.
The decision proved costly. The point was awarded to Medvedev, giving him a 0-30 lead at a crucial juncture. From there, the Russian was able to capitalise, shifting momentum decisively in his favour. Draper, who had been competing strongly, was unable to recover from the setback.
The incident quickly became a focal point for debate, with critics highlighting the unusual timing of the review. Rather than being addressed in real time, the hindrance call was made after the rally had ended, prompting questions about whether such interventions undermine the natural flow of play.
Journalist Jon Wertheim later outlined the ATP’s response, confirming that the governing body had acted to prevent similar scenarios in the future.
"Two ATP Tour rule changes to watch.
a) Video review of hindrance after the point (a la Medvedev/Draper)... (in effect no longer trialled).
b) Video review challenges are unlimited but chair ‘will retain control over the process’ and has discretion to deny any unreasonable requests.”
Two @atptour rule changes to watch:
— Jon Wertheim (@jon_wertheim) March 17, 2026
a) video review of hindrance *after the point* (a la Medvedev/Draper) ... (in effect no longer trialed)
b) Video review challenges are unlimited *but* chair "will retain control over the process" and has discretion to deny unreasonable…

Cristhián AvilaTennis Journalist
Cristhián Ávila is a tennis journalist based in Santiago, Chile, and has been part of the TennisUpToDate team since early 2023. He covers the ATP and WTA Tours as well as all four Grand Slams, producing breaking news, match reports, analysis, and regular liveblogs from major tournaments.
His reporting combines statistical analysis with clear explanation, helping readers understand tactical developments, player form, and broader storylines across the tour. Working fluently in both Spanish and English, Cristhián collaborates with an international editorial team and contributes to comprehensive global coverage. As part of his work, he has conducted interviews and media interactions with leading figures in the sport, including Caroline Wozniacki and John McEnroe.
In his journalism, Cristhián places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. His coverage is grounded in research, context, and direct engagement with professional tennis.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Vacherot is Mongasque, rather than Swiss. The tournament was Swiss :DTrwd7702-11-2026
- After a couple decades traveling to IIHF tourneys overseas... our family is done with it... and I will not be the only one!! Bad enough the NHL allows Ovachenko (a Putin Supporter and Campaigner) to live and play in the USA. Let's not forget the STATE SPONSORED RUSSIAN DOPING PROGRAMS still in effect today.
mandoist31-10-2026 - Osaka's mental state apparently does not allow her to reach any more Quarter Finals? I mean, she doesn't really have the time for tennis with all the pre-planning that must go into her 12 year-old "fashion" goals.
mandoist29-10-2026 - With her money one would think she could afford a better team of Psychiatrists?
mandoist29-10-2026 - Boss move, Sinner !Rapunzel27-10-2026
- Apparently still refusing to seek 'help' ...and still playing Dress-Up like a 10 year-old.
mandoist27-10-2026 - Lena... Takin' care of business
mandoist25-10-2026 - Can you please stop publishing this nonsense? Stick to Tennis.
mandoist25-10-2026 - Does Sinner need that 4.5 mil? I doubt it. He can make that with three modelling gigs!😅🤣Rapunzel21-10-2026
- Did "People Magazine" purchase this website? This nonstop storyline is bullshit.
mandoist21-10-2026







