Carlos Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic advanced to the third round of the 2026
Indian Wells Masters after contrasting wins on a busy Saturday in
Indian Wells. Alcaraz cruised past Grigor Dimitrov in straight sets, while Djokovic recovered from a slow start to defeat Kamil Majchrzak in three. Taylor Fritz also survived a stern test against Jacob Fearnley, and Daniil Medvedev progressed with a composed win over Alejandro Tabilo.
Elsewhere, Alex de Minaur rallied from a set down to beat Sebastian Korda, while rising Brazilian Joao Fonseca saved match points before stunning Karen Khachanov. The results helped shape the early rounds of the Masters 1000 event as several top contenders safely booked their places in the next stage.
Carlos Alcaraz def. Grigor Dimitrov – 6-2, 6-3
World No. 1 Carlos Alcaraz delivered a composed performance to defeat Grigor Dimitrov in straight sets and continue his strong start to the 2026 season. The Spaniard controlled the match from the opening exchanges, quickly establishing authority from the baseline and breaking Dimitrov twice to secure the first set 6-2.
The second set followed a similar pattern. Dimitrov attempted to stay aggressive on serve and shorten points, but Alcaraz remained consistent and patient during extended rallies. The decisive moment came late in the set when the Spaniard secured a crucial break before confidently serving out the match.
Alcaraz’s efficiency on serve proved particularly significant. He landed 71% of his first serves and won 77% of those points, while also dominating second-serve exchanges. Dimitrov struggled to gain traction on return, creating only one break opportunity throughout the match. Alcaraz eventually closed the contest by winning 12 of the final 14 points, extending his winning streak in 2026 to 13 matches.
Match Statistics Carlos Alcaraz vs. Grigor Dimitrov
| Carlos Alcaraz |
VS |
Grigor Dimitrov |
| 6 |
Aces |
1 |
| 2 |
Double Faults |
5 |
| 71% (35/49) |
1st Service Percentage |
60% (29/48) |
| 77% (27/35) |
1st Service Points Won |
76% (22/29) |
| 71% (10/14) |
2nd Service Points Won |
26% (5/19) |
| 100% (1/1) |
Break Points Saved |
25% (1/4) |
| 100% (9/9) |
Service Games |
63% (5/8) |
| 24% (7/29) |
1st Return Points Won |
23% (8/35) |
| 74% (14/19) |
2nd Return Points Won |
29% (4/14) |
Novak Djokovic def. Kamil Majchrzak – 4-6, 6-1, 6-2
Novak Djokovic was forced to recover from an early deficit before securing a three-set victory over Kamil Majchrzak. The Polish player made an impressive start, breaking twice to build a 4-1 lead in the opening set. Although Djokovic managed to reduce the deficit, Majchrzak showed resilience under pressure, saving three break points at 5-4 before closing the set.
Djokovic responded emphatically in the second set. Raising his level significantly, the 24-time Grand Slam champion dominated behind his first serve and applied sustained pressure on return. The Serbian raced to a 5-0 lead and ultimately wrapped up the set 6-1 to force a decider.
In the final set, Djokovic’s experience proved decisive. An early break allowed him to take control of the scoreboard, and Majchrzak began to show signs of tension during longer rallies. Djokovic added another break later in the set and closed out the match comfortably to reach the third round despite an uneven start.
Match Statistics Novak Djokovic vs. Kamil Majchrzak
| Novak Djokovic |
VS |
Kamil Majchrzak |
| 5 |
Aces |
3 |
| 5 |
Double Faults |
1 |
| 67% (54/81) |
1st Service Percentage |
63% (62/99) |
| 78% (42/54) |
1st Service Points Won |
63% (39/62) |
| 44% (12/27) |
2nd Service Points Won |
38% (14/37) |
| 60% (3/5) |
Break Points Saved |
69% (11/16) |
| 85% (11/13) |
Service Games |
58% (7/12) |
| 37% (23/62) |
1st Return Points Won |
22% (12/54) |
| 62% (23/37) |
2nd Return Points Won |
56% (15/27) |
Jack Draper def. Roberto Bautista Agut – 3-6, 6-3, 6-2
Jack Draper recovered from a slow start to defeat Roberto Bautista Agut in three sets and keep his campaign alive in the California desert. The Spaniard controlled the early stages of the match, capitalising on Draper’s inconsistent first serve to claim the opening set 6-3.
Draper gradually found his rhythm in the second set, improving both his serve and his aggression from the baseline. The Brit began dictating rallies with his forehand and created more pressure on return, allowing him to level the match by taking the set 6-3.
Momentum fully shifted in the deciding set. Draper’s serve became a major weapon as he won 88% of points behind his first delivery, while Bautista Agut struggled to generate opportunities on return. The British No. 1 secured the decisive break early in the set and maintained control through the closing stages, eventually sealing the victory 6-2 to move into the third round.
Match Statistics Bautista Agut vs. Draper
| Bautista Agut |
VS |
Draper |
| 1 |
Aces |
9 |
| 1 |
Double Faults |
2 |
| 81% (59/73) |
1st Service Percentage |
57% (40/70) |
| 66% (39/59) |
1st Service Points Won |
88% (35/40) |
| 43% (6/14) |
2nd Service Points Won |
57% (17/30) |
| 57% (4/7) |
Break Points Saved |
86% (6/7) |
| 77% (10/13) |
Service Games |
92% (12/13) |
| 13% (5/40) |
1st Return Points Won |
34% (20/59) |
| 43% (13/30) |
2nd Return Points Won |
57% (8/14) |
Taylor Fritz def. Jacob Fearnley – 6-3, 6-7(6), 6-1
Taylor Fritz survived a tense second-set collapse before reasserting control in the deciding set against Jacob Fearnley. The American began strongly, breaking early and serving efficiently to claim the opening set 6-3 with a dominant performance behind his first serve.
The second set produced the most dramatic moments of the match. Fritz appeared close to victory when he held multiple match points, including opportunities on his own serve at 5-3. However, Fearnley refused to fade, saving four match points and forcing a tie-break.
The British player completed the comeback in the breaker after trailing 5-1, sending the contest into a deciding set. Fritz quickly reset his focus in the third, breaking early and dictating play with his powerful serve and forehand. The world No. 7 regained full control and closed the match 6-1 in the decider.
Match Statistics Jacob Fearnley vs. Taylor Fritz
| Jacob Fearnley |
VS |
Taylor Fritz |
| 5 |
Aces |
20 |
| 6 |
Double Faults |
1 |
| 66% (65/99) |
1st Service Percentage |
72% (68/95) |
| 68% (44/65) |
1st Service Points Won |
79% (54/68) |
| 44% (15/34) |
2nd Service Points Won |
56% (15/27) |
| 56% (5/9) |
Break Points Saved |
75% (3/4) |
| 69% (9/13) |
Service Games |
93% (14/15) |
| 21% (14/68) |
1st Return Points Won |
32% (21/65) |
| 44% (12/27) |
2nd Return Points Won |
56% (19/34) |
Alex de Minaur def. Sebastian Korda – 4-6, 6-4, 6-4
Alex de Minaur completed a resilient comeback to defeat Sebastian Korda in a competitive three-set encounter. Korda initially appeared in control, recovering from an early deficit to take the opening set 6-4 thanks to strong first-serve efficiency.
De Minaur gradually shifted the momentum during the second set by maintaining consistent pressure in baseline exchanges. A break at 3-3 proved decisive as the Australian held comfortably to level the match and force a decider.
The final set remained tight, with both players holding serve through the early stages. De Minaur eventually secured the crucial breakthrough in the ninth game, capitalising on Korda’s brief dip in consistency. The Australian then served out the match with authority to secure his place in the third round.
Match Statistics Sebastian Korda vs. Alex de Minaur
| Sebastian Korda |
VS |
Alex de Minaur |
| 6 |
Aces |
8 |
| 3 |
Double Faults |
4 |
| 59% (54/91) |
1st Service Percentage |
58% (59/101) |
| 72% (39/54) |
1st Service Points Won |
63% (37/59) |
| 46% (17/37) |
2nd Service Points Won |
64% (27/42) |
| 57% (4/7) |
Break Points Saved |
71% (5/7) |
| 80% (12/15) |
Service Games |
87% (13/15) |
| 37% (22/59) |
1st Return Points Won |
28% (15/54) |
| 36% (15/42) |
2nd Return Points Won |
54% (20/37) |
Joao Fonseca def. Karen Khachanov – 4-6, 7-6, 6-4
Joao Fonseca produced one of the most dramatic wins of the session, coming from behind to defeat Karen Khachanov and reach the third round at Indian Wells for the first time in his career. Khachanov initially appeared in control after building a double-break lead in the opening set and closing it out 6-4 despite a late push from the Brazilian.
The second set proved decisive for the momentum of the match. Both players held serve throughout before Khachanov moved ahead 6-4 in the tie-break, earning two match points. Fonseca, however, responded with remarkable composure, saving both opportunities with aggressive baseline play before turning the breaker around to force a deciding set.
The final set remained tight with few opportunities on return. Fonseca stayed patient from the baseline and capitalised on a brief dip from Khachanov to secure the crucial break that ultimately decided the match. The Brazilian then held his nerve on serve to complete the comeback and advance to the third round, where he will face 23rd seed Tommy Paul.
Match Statistics Karen Khachanov vs. Joao Fonseca
| Karen Khachanov |
VS |
Joao Fonseca |
| 12 |
Aces |
11 |
| 3 |
Double Faults |
3 |
| 61% (59/97) |
1st Service Percentage |
71% (66/93) |
| 75% (44/59) |
1st Service Points Won |
80% (53/66) |
| 58% (22/38) |
2nd Service Points Won |
48% (13/27) |
| 25% (1/4) |
Break Points Saved |
57% (4/7) |
| 81% (13/16) |
Service Games |
81% (13/16) |
| 20% (13/66) |
1st Return Points Won |
25% (15/59) |
| 52% (14/27) |
2nd Return Points Won |
42% (16/38) |
Daniil Medvedev def. Alejandro Tabilo – 6-4, 6-2
Daniil Medvedev produced one of the most controlled performances of the day, defeating Alejandro Tabilo in straight sets without facing a single break point. The former world No. 1 made an immediate impact, breaking in the opening game after a lengthy exchange of break-point opportunities.
Once ahead, Medvedev maintained steady pressure from the baseline and consistently neutralised Tabilo’s serve. The Russian protected his advantage throughout the first set, holding comfortably and closing it out 6-4 after both players largely held serve following the early break.
Medvedev increased the intensity in the second set, converting additional break chances to extend his lead. His serve remained highly effective, landing an impressive 84% of first serves and winning 72% of those points. Tabilo struggled to generate opportunities on return, allowing Medvedev to finish the match in just over an hour and move confidently into the next round.
Match Statistics Daniil Medvedev vs. Alejandro Tabilo
| Daniil Medvedev |
VS |
Alejandro Tabilo |
| 6 |
Aces |
3 |
| 1 |
Double Faults |
0 |
| 84% (43/51) |
1st Service Percentage |
67% (38/57) |
| 72% (31/43) |
1st Service Points Won |
74% (28/38) |
| 63% (5/8) |
2nd Service Points Won |
21% (4/19) |
| - (0/0) |
Break Points Saved |
63% (5/8) |
| 100% (9/9) |
Service Games |
67% (6/9) |
| 26% (10/38) |
1st Return Points Won |
28% (12/43) |
| 79% (15/19) |
2nd Return Points Won |
38% (3/8) |