Carlos Alcaraz surpasses career record held by coach Juan Carlos Ferrero following Rotterdam title win
ATP
Tennis sensation Carlos Alcaraz continues to add accolades to his already distinguished career, and the Spaniard will have another record to brag over coach Juan Carlos Ferrero after the youngster's victory at the ABN AMRO Open.
The former World No.1 made his debut at the Rotterdam event this year, seeking his first indoor hard court title. Alcaraz powered his way through to the final, where he defeated a game Alex de Minaur in three sets to win his 17th career ATP title.
Alcaraz overtakes Ferrero in title tally
Although Ferrero was unable to accompany his mentee to the ATP 500 event, Alcaraz had secondary coach Samuel Lopez in his coaching box. Lopez's presence seemed to be sufficient, as Alcaraz was able to overcome the opposition, becoming the first Spaniard to win the Rotterdam title.
By virtue of his victory, Alcaraz claims a 17th career ATP title, at just 21 years of age. This puts him one title ahead of coach Ferrero, who was also a World No.1 but had only 16 titles by the time his career came to an end. With Alcaraz still in his early twenties, you can expect the reigning Wimbledon champion to add several more titles to his trophy cabinet.
Alcaraz and Ferrero have been working together since 2019. The duo have won five of the same titles, with the French Open being the only Grand Slam title Ferrero has to his name.
It means so much to me to win in Rotterdam! 🏆 It has been a very special week! 🔝 Thank you for the support from day one! ❤️ Congratulations @alexdeminaur for the tournament and a tremendous battle today in the final! 🤝🏻🔥
— Carlos Alcaraz (@carlosalcaraz) February 9, 2025
📸 @atptour pic.twitter.com/VSBzt8NF2H
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- "Intensified" ??? Yeah, right. Nothing has changed... nothing has "intensidfied"; only continued.
mandoist10-02-2025 - Bencic is all business right now. If Rybakina is the ice queen, then Bencic is Antarctica—colder, sharper, and seemingly unstoppable. 🔥❄️MrAndreeva07-02-2025
- Creepy.mandoist07-02-2025
- Ouch!!mandoist07-02-2025
- they need to change the rules on the WTA to limit wildcards more effectively like they have on the ATPSososo06-02-2025
- This is just getting beyond ridiculous!! Not to mention unsportsmanlike and unfair to serious up & coming contenders.mandoist06-02-2025
- No, writer, we were not "stunned". If you knew your business you would have been aware of her statement last weekend re: her knee and retirement. The main take-away here is that Simona went out on her own terms. She surely wanted to play again after WTA & ITIA screwed her out of her final productive seasons. Personally, I believed she was going to make this announcement when I saw the President and his family in their box seats. Good for Simone -- now she can move on to other things as she said she would.mandoist04-02-2025
- It sounds seriously absurd that in Davis Cup, (unlike Grand Slams such as the Aus Open), medical time outs off court with the medical staff are not allowed?? I mean, if this was an Aus Open match, and the same thing happened to Gurin then, he would have been able to go off court for official medical time out and make an informed decision whether to resume the match or retire. How come such conditions do not apply in Davis Cup?? I mean, there with Davis Cup, it is even more like a soccer match or basketball game in that teams are playing. And so as with those, it ought to be the case in tennis that if a player needs serious medical time out, then one of the other team mates ought to substitute and each team needs to have stand-ins or understudies in case substitution is needed which will be rare but as we can see here, this kind of circumstance fits. But even if the teams do not go down the road of subbing other team mates in, in case of a health issue like the one which played out here, at least, as in the Aus Open and other Grand Slams, there ought to be time-outs with the health professionals and at the conclusion of these time-outs, the particular decision that has been reached between them and the player needs to be taken on board by the umpire. PERIOD.
Sueiyin04-02-2025 - "If Novak did this, he would be defaulted for life. WTF." 🤣 WTF sounds like What Tennis Fury?! What Tennis Flurry??! I mean, se-rious-ly, it was actually the unfairness of the silly umpire's decision that is the issue here! Further, how come it was Gurin & his team who got disqualified? If this kind of thing happens in soccer, it would be the other guy getting the yellow or red card! Because after all, it was the Belgian who's foul it was so why then penalize the opponents for something they didn't instigate? Fouls in both basketball and soccer are read as a hinderance that has been caused by the player who INITIALLY instigated the hinderance. In this case, okay, it is tennis, but while the precise rules are different to either soccer or basketball, the same type of recognition as to whoever instigates a hinderance should apply, and in this case, it was the Belgian player.Sueiyin04-02-2025
- Medvedev talking to his form here. "Some actual deep problem." 🤣😂🤣MrAndreeva03-02-2025
