“I would never bet against him”: Boris Becker still sees a path for Djokovic against Sinner in Melbourne
ATPFriday, 30 January 2026 at 02:30
Boris Becker referred to Novak Djokovic’s chances in his Australian Open semifinal clash against two-time defending champion Jannik Sinner. The German gave Djokovic – his former protégé – a chance, although he acknowledged how difficult it is for him to defeat the Italian world No. 2 in Melbourne.
Nole and Sinner have already faced each other on 10 occasions, with a 6–4 record in favour of the 24-year-old Italian – including the last five encounters, all of which ended in victories for Sinner. In 2025, they met in three Grand Slam semifinals, all wins for Sinner, who has captured 11 of the last 12 sets played between them.
“I would never bet against him, but playing Sinner is the toughest thing to do in Australia,” commented Boris Becker in a recent interview with TNT Sports. “He has won two times in a row and Djokovic lost to him two years ago in the semis. But Novak has won the tournament 10 times; if there is one man that knows how to win the Australian Open it’s him.”
The six-time Grand Slam champion coached Nole for several years, accompanying him during six of his Grand Slam titles, including the Australian Open in 2013 and 2016. “The only reason Djokovic plays tennis is to win Grand Slams, to get to that 25 and get to that 11 in Australia. He has done everything else in tennis. He will push himself as much as he can.”
According to Becker, a long match could even benefit the Serbian, considering the physical issues Sinner showed in the third round. “Let it all out,” urged Becker. “If you hope that Sinner will give it to you, then you are mistaken. You have to be the first one that goes for the corners, you have to decide the tempo of the match and control the centre of the court and get your free points on the first serve.”
“Take a bit of a chance on Sinner’s second serve, and also Sinner struggled physically a few days ago, so once you get to the three-hour mark, I don’t think it’s a disadvantage for Djokovic, even though he is much older,” Becker stated. “The longer he can stay in the match, the higher the chance he can win.”
Djokovic’s path to the semifinals marked by opponents’ injuries
Djokovic’s road to the semifinals has been marked by the injuries of his opponents. After getting through the first three rounds in straight sets, the 24-time Grand Slam champion did not have to step onto the court in the Round of 16, following the withdrawal of his opponent Jakub Mensik due to injury, which handed Djokovic a walkover into the quarterfinals.
Luck was then again on Nole’s side in the clash against world No. 5 Lorenzo Musetti. After going two sets down, the Italian retired due to injury, allowing Djokovic to advance to the semifinals – despite the fact that he has not won a set since the third round.
For Becker, it is not the ideal situation for Djokovic to arrive with so little time on court, as he needs competitive matches to reach his best level. “You don’t get match fit in practice even if you are Novak Djokovic,” Becker added. “You can see that with the blisters on his foot, you get blisters by not having enough calluses on your feet, and you get calluses by playing a lot of matches.”
“He has to play better tennis and it starts with the foot. The physio and the doctors have to do the best job of putting on enough protection so he can run, and then he has to let it all out,” Boris Becker added about the Serbian. “If he holds back and is too defensive and tentative, then Sinner will crush him. If he goes in thinking of the best Djokovic that has played in Melbourne, then he has a chance.”
Djokovic and Sinner will face each other this Friday, January 30, in search of a place in the final. The winner will meet the victor of the clash between Carlos Alcaraz and Alexander Zverev. Both Sinner and Alcaraz are aiming to contest a Grand Slam final for the fourth consecutive time, while for Djokovic the objective will be to return to his first major final since Wimbledon 2024 – and to finally overcome the semifinal barrier, a stage where he repeatedly fell in 2025, reaching the semifinals in all four Grand Slam tournaments contested last season.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- "It’s difficult to say we don’t agree” Correction: It’s difficult to say [ I ] don’t agree. While she is an intelligent and well educated person, she may not be all that aware of certain character flaws. Perhaps a psychologist or ten might be of some help?
- Sabalenka should ignore that nonsense and continue doing what she does. The sport of tennis has been corrupted by the American government. And America is the most racist country on earth. It is clear that some players are being targeted for discrimination based on their nationality. Screaming hasn't just start in tennis. Sharapova, Serena, etc. always did scream and nothing was said. You cannot control ignorance.
- If she wants privacy, then she should quit tennis. The same thing happened to Sabalenka at the US Open after she loss the final, and no one was talking about privacy. Instead they criticized Sabalenka. Anyone who knows Gauff is well aware that she is a sore loser and cannot control her anger after a loss. You cannot tell someone where to place their cameras. She needs to separate herself from her parents and GROW UP. She is 21 years old.
- Coco is a sore loser. She does that all the time. At least now, she goes behind closed doors, instead of interrupting the matches with her meltdown. The same thing happened to Sabalenka at the US Open. The only difference is, Sabalenka knows how to handle things like an adult. Gauff on the other hand needs to GROW UP. She is 21 and she needs to act like it. There is no way you can play a sport and cannot stand to lose.
- No one is interested in seeing her. She is not going to do anything but cheat a younger player out of a wildcard and lose in the first round. If their lives is that miserable and they want to return, let them go thru qualifications like everyone else.
- She never ever screams in practice. Not ever.
- I'm amazed at the freedom cameras have on courts as well. In the past, cross-court cameras were vividly showing what amounted to "upskirts" as women sat on their respective benches. The players resorted to placing towels between or over their legs. A practice still in play today. Same with camera's habits of basically zooming-in on down-blouse shots. That seems to have lessened; at least no more zooming-in as they bend forward prepping to face an opponent's serve. In addition, the invasion of privacy during medical treatment on-court is absurd. As are the in-your-face close-ups of players at their bench. If I were seeking a moment to concentrate or simply relax between games I'd trash that camera in a nanosecond.
- Talking about that situation with the American Dictator is one thing. Taking action is another. When is both the ATP and WTA is going to hand down punishment to the American athletes like they did with the Russians and Belarusians?, They took no time mixing sports with politics when it came to Ukraine. Right now, it is showing that the sport of tennis is actually controlled by the American Government. That is why there is so much Corruption going on.
- PLACED IN THE SEMIS IS RIGHT. BECAUSE UNLIKE ALL THE OTHER PLAYERS, PEGULA IS NEVER GIVEN ANY QUALITY OPPONENTS IN HER SECTION OF THE DRAW. THEREFORE IT HELPS HER TO GO DEEP INTO THE DRAWS. BY THE TIME SHE MEETS UP WITH A QUALITY OPPONENT, HER OPPONENT IS EXHAUSTED FROM THE PREVIOUS MATCH. IT IS CALLED DRAW FIXING. AND THAT AMERICAN BACK WTA IS FULL OF CORRUPTION. AND HAS RUINED WOMEN TENNIS. PEGULA DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE BODY BUILD TO LIFT A TROPHY. THEREFORE THEY DO WHAT AMERICANS DO BEST. IF YOU CANNOT EARN IT, CHEAT AND STEAL IT.
- THERE IS NOTHING TO TELL HER. AS USUAL, THE DRAWS WERE DESIGNED TO HELP PEGULA LIFT THE TROPHY. UNLIKE, EVERYONE ELSE ALL PEGULA OPPONENTS CAME OFF OUT OF THE JUNIOR SECTION.
Loading