(VIDEO) Holger Rune retires in tears from Stockholm Open semi-final, assisted off court in heartbreaking scenes
ATPSaturday, 18 October 2025 at 16:57
There were heartbreaking scenes at the Stockholm Open as Holger Rune was forced to retire in tears and couldn't leave the court without being assisted after leading by one set in his semi-final against Ugo Humbert.
He was leading by one set against Humbert 6-4, 2-2 when he was no longer able to continue. After a lateral movement, Rune felt something in his foot and immediately stopped. He was left with a towel draped over his face with the crowd concerned including his mother Aneke as the doctor and physio were sat by his side.
The 22-year-old shook hands with his opponent before leaving the court on one leg. Ugo Humbert of course benefits from this as he reaches a second final of the year. He had claimed an early break in the first set before Rune fought back to take the lead only to be halted by injury. He will now face off against Denis Shapovalov or Casper Ruud next.
This after he saw off Lorenzo Sonego and Matteo Berrettini in the rounds prior to reach this point but for Rune who was due to play Swiss Indoors next week, he now has a stint on the sidelines likely.
“It’s not the way I wanted to win. I just hope he’s okay,” said Humbert after the match. “There’s not much more to say. He was playing better than me, but that’s all I can say for now.”
Read also
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- These guys are either clueless... or covering for Vukov. The cause (Vukov) happens first; the Effect happens second. This is looking very volatile and hurtful. We want the Elena we used to know to return. Shame on WTA for giving-in to Vukov's monthly piles of submissions and applications begging for his return to tennis.
mandoist12-11-2025 - Dementieva is way off-base in her uninformative statements here. Why was this "article" even written? She knows nothing, was not on the tour and, according to her, she did not see nor hear Vukov's actions. She is absolutely wrong saying "no one knows". There were first-hand witnesses of Vukov's behaviors who were deposed in the investigation. What the investigation revealed were/are officially sealed and no one will ever see the findings without a court order. Very few people read the final documents -- at least one of them remained silent but did state they were "stunned" by what they read. Dementieva has no place here. As for Lena, she is extremely and openly bitter toward WTA and this is not likely to end well. Denial is her perogative; but it will not serve her future in a positive way. She already is acting like Vukov. Elena is not the person she used to be; and that is sad.mandoist12-11-2025
- Until WTA and ATP stop acting like he MONOPOLY they are, they are likely to continue to disregard any and all of these proposals. Currently they practice the Art Of Not Listening (okay, in the one meeting last July the Elitist committee members "listened" and agreed to "consider the options"... then did nothing). WTA / ATP continue to 'kick the can down the road' in their obstinance.mandoist11-11-2025
- Not the brightest ball in the can. Period.mandoist10-11-2025
- Sabalenka takes her losses very hard but she absolutely MUST exercise a bit more control over her tongue!Rapunzel10-11-2025
- Chair umpires are more often than not (this season in particular) making what seems like unsatisfactory "discretionary calls". The disconnect between what are WTA/ATP regulations (written in black & white) in their own Rulebook 2025 and actual ENFORCEMENT of said rules is more than obvious. Time to get Chair Ump's on the same page. Discretion is not really working once you consider countless non-calls for destroying racquets, smashing balls at or near people on the playing surfaces, smashing balls violently into the stands, cheating the serving time clock -- and, yes, screaming and shouting ad nauseum even through an opponent's returns [Sabalenka's 'performances' are clearly beyond "hindrance" according to rulebook]. These issues can be easily resolved. However, as we have seen all too often, Pro Tennis has no reasonable 'Checks and Balances'. They are a closed door entity... and that is very likely not a sustainable position to uphold in this century of sport.mandoist10-11-2025
- Sabalenka should have spoken to Elena at the trophy ceremony using these words someone wrote for her social media post. A 'thank you' post which did not include a mention of Rybakina or her team. Even taking into account she is not a bright person, and her borderline sarcasm, Sabalenka is a bad loser who cannot control her reactions and/or negative actions during and after matches.mandoist10-11-2025
- It would be interesting (to me) to know what made WTA change their minds about the Vukov ban and reinstate him in such a short amount of time? Possibly the fact they were tired of having to officially deal with Vukov's bi-weekly applications he submitted for his reinstatement? We'll never see the official charges in the documents; they are legally sealed. But some who have seen the charges were stunned by the findings. So his reinstatement made no sense at all to the inner circle. FWIW: Having attended tourneys since August, I personally witnessed Lena & Vukov sniping and bickering with one another on several occasions. I doubt this chapter is over.mandoist09-11-2025
- Ater years of her ridiculous screaming (which has only increased to the point of unfairness -- aka: "Hinderance") I can no longer justify her actions nor my participation as a viewer. I did watch the Pegula & Anisimova matches out of hope that they win... but without audio. We have never received an explanation as to why Sabalenka is afforded the privilege of, in her ever-lengthening Amazon yells, allowed to scream all the way through an opponent's strike at the ball. How is that not a 'hinderance'?? I won't get started on the pathetic Saudi Sportswashing of pro sports.mandoist08-11-2025
- Iga Swiatek was right. This chair umpire cares more about her looks.MrAndreeva06-11-2025
Loading