"Federer and Nadal were symbolically much more for the people than Nole": David Nalbandian draws a clear line in the Big Three argument

Former World No. 3 David Nalbandian, one of the most emblematic figures in Argentine tennis, has reappeared in the public eye to offer his perspective on the most recurring debate in the history of the sport. In a recent interview with the YouTube program "Clank," the former world number three analyzed the legacy of the "Big Three," rivals he faced numerous times during the latter part of his career.

In fact, Nalbandian holds an interesting record as the only player to defeat the Big Three in the same draw to be crowned champion. The Argentine lifted the Madrid Open title, defeating Rafael Nadal (2nd) in the quarterfinals, Novak Djokovic (3rd) in the semifinals, and Roger Federer (1st) in the final along the way. He became the third player to beat the No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 in the same week—joining Boris Becker (Stockholm 1994) and Novak Djokovic (Canada 2007).

For the man from Córdoba, the discussion requires a clear distinction between objective achievements and the personal preferences of the fans. Nalbandian did not hesitate to point out who, in his criteria, is the best in terms of results and professionalism, although he acknowledged that greatness involves factors that go beyond lifting trophies.

“I think there is unanimity and there are different tastes. Without a doubt, Nole is the best by results and everything, but you might like Roger and Rafa more, who are a tad lower numerically, but were symbolically much more for the people than Nole, so there is a question of tastes,” he explained.

"King David" emphasized that while Novak Djokovic possesses the statistical advantage, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal occupy a different symbolic place in the public's heart. It is a debate that transcends the court, touching on chords of style and charisma.

Beyond popularity, Nalbandian highlighted the crucial role the Serbian played in the technical and mental evolution of his rivals. According to his vision, Djokovic's irruption forced Federer and Nadal to raise their own standards to remain competitive.

“It's more about taste and the impression he caused on people,” assured the champion of 11 ATP titles. “For me the best is Djokovic, the most professional, then you can like [the others] more or less.”

The former tennis player concluded that this competition was symbiotic and essential for the history of the sport. “Djokovic helped Roger and Rafa to keep improving, to keep having objectives and not only between the two of them. I think between the three of them they boosted each other,” added the 2002 Wimbledon runner-up.

Nalbandian finished in the Top 10 for five consecutive years (2003-2007) and spent a total of seven seasons in the Top 12. The Argentine won two Masters 1000 titles and reached another four finals; he played semifinals in all Grand Slams, with his best performance being the 2002 Wimbledon final, where he was defeated by Lleyton Hewitt.

The statistics reveal fierce battles against the Big Three throughout his career. Against Novak Djokovic, Nalbandian played on five occasions, achieving one victory for the Argentine against four for the Serbian. Against Rafael Nadal, the record marks seven clashes, with two victories for "The King" and five for the Spaniard. These numbers demonstrate that Nalbandian was a rival capable of making the best in history uncomfortable.

Finally, his most extensive rivalry was against Roger Federer, whom he faced 19 times. Although the record ended in favor of "His Majesty" by 11 to 8, Nalbandian managed to beat the Swiss 8 times, standing out as one of the most difficult opponents for Federer—ranking fifth in the ATP head-to-head record against the Swiss Maestro, behind only Djokovic, Nadal, Murray, and Hewitt.