
American favourites Coco Gauff and Madison Keys continue to advance at Indian Wells after eliminating tough rivals such as Elise Mertens and two-time finalist Maria Sakkari. Both Americans have reached the fourth round and are awaiting their next opponents.
World No. 3 Gauff defeated two-time finalist Sakkari 7-6, 6-2, while the Greek player now faces a significant drop in the rankings, possibly close to No. 50. On the other hand, Keys overcame a resilient Mertens in a hard-fought match, extending her winning streak to 14 consecutive victories.
Read also
Gauff's confidence shines through
The match started with uncertainty on both sides, as they both broke each other’s serve at their first opportunity. Not only that, but they reached 2-2 without either player holding serve. Once both players found their rhythm, service games became easier, although Gauff always seemed to put more pressure on her opponent’s serve.
At 5-4, World No. 3 Gauff had a chance to claim the first set. Sakkari committed a double fault, giving Gauff a set point, but Sakkari saved it and leveled the score at 5-5. No one managed to break serve, and the set was decided in the tie-break. Gauff looked more confident in the exchanges, and Sakkari’s errors handed the American a set that could have gone either way.
Read also
Sakkari, who has been off her best form in recent months, showed why she’s reached two Indian Wells finals, as the conditions suited her style of play. In the second set, Sakkari fought back from a break down to level at 2-2 and revived her hopes. However, after that, Gauff put pressure on her, breaking twice in a row to go 5-2 ahead, with her own serve to follow. A final game with Gauff’s serve, which was balanced, ended with Gauff taking the win on her 6th match point, 7-6, 6-2. She will now face the winner of the match between Diana Shnaider and Belinda Bencic.
Match Statistics Gauff vs. Sakkari
| Gauff | VS | Sakkari |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 2 | Aces | 2 |
| 7 | Double Faults | 6 |
| 69% (46/67) | 1st Service Percentage | 57% (34/60) |
| 74% (34/46) | 1st Service Points Won | 59% (20/34) |
| 27% (6/22) | 2nd Service Points Won | 31% (8/26) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Saved | 38% (3/8) |
| 67% (6/9) | Service Games | 50% (5/10) |
| Return | ||
| 41% (14/34) | 1st Return Points Won | 26% (12/46) |
| 69% (18/26) | 2nd Return Points Won | 73% (16/22) |
| - | Break Points Saved | - |
| Other | ||
| 1h 32m | Match Duration | 1h 32m |
Keys outlasts Mertens in thriller
Mertens was undoubtedly a dangerous opponent for Keys, as the Belgian has been a consistent top-30 player for the last eight seasons. Mertens started well in the first part of the match but faltered at crucial points. The Belgian wasted six break points in her favour, while Keys capitalised on her second break point and took a 4-1 lead.
Read also
In the next game, Mertens wasted another three consecutive break points, and Keys, with confidence, seized her opportunity at the end of the set to secure a second break and win the set 6-2, a result that seemed more comfortable than the match had shown. Mertens' low first serve percentage (48%) was one of the factors Keys took advantage of in key moments.
In the second set, one of the most contested games saw Keys waste six break points, but on her 7th chance, she converted. Within minutes, she was 3-0 up. Keys kept her lead and served for the match at 5-4 but wasted two match points, and Mertens managed to level the score. They went to a tie-break, where Keys wasted another couple of match points, and Mertens won the set 7-6 [10-8].
Read also
In the third set, the American seemed to be in better form, more determined to secure the win. With the support of the home crowd, the recent Australian Open champion played some of her best tennis of the match. Despite Mertens’ resistance, Keys wrapped up the win 6-2, 6-7 [8], 6-4. A convincing performance that sends her to the fourth round, where she will face the winner between Emma Navarro.
Match Statistics Mertens vs. Keys
| Mertens | VS | Keys |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 1 | Aces | 5 |
| 9 | Double Faults | 12 |
| 54% (66/123) | 1st Service Percentage | 59% (76/128) |
| 70% (46/66) | 1st Service Points Won | 75% (57/76) |
| 40% (23/57) | 2nd Service Points Won | 33% (17/52) |
| 63% (10/16) | Break Points Saved | 80% (12/15) |
| 60% (9/15) | Service Games | 80% (12/15) |
| Return | ||
| 25% (19/76) | 1st Return Points Won | 30% (20/66) |
| 67% (35/52) | 2nd Return Points Won | 60% (34/57) |
| - | Break Points Saved | - |
| Other | ||
| 2h 52m | Match Duration | 2h 52m |

Cristhián AvilaTennis Journalist
Cristhián Ávila is a tennis journalist based in Santiago, Chile, and has been part of the TennisUpToDate team since early 2023. He covers the ATP and WTA Tours as well as all four Grand Slams, producing breaking news, match reports, analysis, and regular liveblogs from major tournaments.
His reporting combines statistical analysis with clear explanation, helping readers understand tactical developments, player form, and broader storylines across the tour. Working fluently in both Spanish and English, Cristhián collaborates with an international editorial team and contributes to comprehensive global coverage. As part of his work, he has conducted interviews and media interactions with leading figures in the sport, including Caroline Wozniacki and John McEnroe.
In his journalism, Cristhián places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. His coverage is grounded in research, context, and direct engagement with professional tennis.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Vukov is doing this to Lena... AGAIN!!!!! WTA's autonomous collective should be dismantled for allowing Vukov to re-emerge from his hand-slapping suspension. Just ask WTA employees how that's been going lately as they witness his continued verbal abuses. Women's Pro Tennis should start over.
mandoist08-11-2026 - Can't help but suspect Vukov is back to his old self again. Thank you, WTA. Perhaps you can give them a "Battling Couple of the Year Award 2026" ??
mandoist08-11-2026 - Wtf? Why is there no reason? And what about the men's?Bel08-11-2026
- One step by another step -- WTA continues to 'lose the plot'. Too many hi-tech microphones being installed at most venues!!! Remove them (especially those along the hallways, sidewalks, and pathways throughout the venues. Not to mention (most of all) remove the mic's from the Players/Coaches Box.
mandoist06-11-2026 - Enough of her bullshit. Go marry someone.
mandoist06-11-2026 - Don't you just love this young lady!? We fans often expect athletes to be supermen and superwomen, often forgetting that they WILL GET TIRED! I love Alex's perspective. Tiredness for an athlete should never be viewed as a negative, especially if you are healthy, taking care of your body and mental health and putting in the work. What a mature perspective. Good for you, Alex!Rapunzel05-11-2026
- Jess is absolutely correct! But the disrespect is a trait I have noticed in most of the Russian players. Mirra is good but very immature and lacks humility. Conceivable needs to get a handle on that!Rapunzel05-11-2026
- Having spent weeks and weeks through the years on tour, I can say with confidence that Conchita was (is) one of the very few who realize the surprising level of maturity (and sometimes lack of) which Mirra seems to have developed in such a demanding adult world of Pro-Tennis. While at the same time reminding herself (Conchita, that is) that Mirra is still young and developing mentally and physically. The general public may forget at times, or not at all realize, these modern era young athletes do not have a 'normal' Youth. It's a major sacrifice, among countless sacrifices, these athletes must make. People who blow-off that fact are ignorant and unfair when they blurt out, "They choose fame so they have to put up with the intrusions on their lives". No, they do not.
mandoist05-11-2026 - Okay... someone with a camera was EAVESDROPPING on a private conversation. Shouldn't that be the point of discussion here? Regardless of the sensationalist crap by media, Pegula (and anyone) has a right to an opinion. There used to be an expectation that private conversations were respected, regardless of 'stardom' and whatever other defensive excuses media tries to shove in our faces. Boo-hoo if feelings are hurt. BTW: Having been employed at various tourney venues, etc., I can't tell you how nasty and offensive players can be when discussing their opponents and colleagues... in "private". Well, I could, but won't. I also challenge anyone to deny what Jessica said is false.
mandoist05-11-2026 - Vacherot is Mongasque, rather than Swiss. The tournament was Swiss :DTrwd7702-11-2026










