"Would guarantee the show people pay for": Patrick Mouratoglou sees easy fix to solve Grand Slam equal prize money debate
WTASaturday, 31 January 2026 at 11:06
Patrick Mouratoglou believes there is an easy fix when it comes to Grand Slams and the debate that always roars on surrounding equal prize money and whether or not the women's players deserve it for not playing as much.
Very often, the Grand Slams use a lot of different barometers often when it comes to deciding scheduling and billing with WTA stars often left behind and the debate yearly especially at the French Open surrounding night session matches in particular.
But Mouratoglou sees a quick fix in regards to making the WTA stars play best of five sets as well and gave detailed reasoning on his LinkedIn surrounding why they should and one of the reasons did in fact surround the scheduling problem.
Also he sees it as finally putting to bed the age old issue when it comes to people going on about the debate surrounding the men working harder for their prize money than the women. Albeit of course at other tournaments when they all play best of three, men are still put higher and despite that gap closing by force, some top tournament still aren't fully there yet showing the disparity on the tour.
Grand Slams have for a long time been equal in regards to prize money but many complain about it so would this fix it?
How would Mouratoglou solve it
"For a long time, the argument against Equal Prize Money in Grand Slams – which is a reality – has centered on the "workload". We hear it constantly: "The men play five sets; the women only play three." 100% believe women should play best-of-five in Slams."
He went on to explain why they should in Ending the Pay Debate in Grand Slams. "Moving to five sets would effectively close the discussion regarding athletes "working more" for their prize money."
While he said it would solve an age old problem and ongoing debate in the Night Session recurring crisis at Roland-Garros. "Tournament organizers often avoid scheduling women’s matches at night because a 40-minute "6-1, 6-1" result leaves fans feeling short-changed. Five sets would guarantee the "show" people pay for.
As well as in the mind of Patrick Mouratoglou, it would show off 'athletic brilliance' which he knows they have in them. "I know these women can do it. It would showcase their endurance and the true physical reality of modern competition.
"Of course, this would bring organizational challenges that need to be solved – from court scheduling to player recovery process – but these are logistics. The core idea must be considered if we want to elevate the quality of the spectacle.
"I was asked if women should play 5 from the semifinals. Why not the quarters, or even earlier. Tennis is a show, and five-set battles are among the most legendary stories are written. Why deprive half the field of that opportunity? Between 1984 and 1998, the final of the WTA finals was played in five sets, and it worked well."
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- MEDICAL TIME OUTS SHOULD TO BE ABOLISHED IN THE SPORT OF TENNIS. BECAUSE IT IS MAINLY BEING USED AS A FORM OF CHEATING. THERE ISN'T ANYTHING WRONG WITH A PLAYER WHEN AFTER A TIMEOUT, HE OR SHE IS STILL RUNNING ALL OVER THE COURT AND SERVING ACES. IF SOMEONE IS HURT, THAT MEANS THEY CANNOT CONTINUE. THEREFORE, THE MATCH SHOULD BE FORFEITED. TENNIS IS FULL OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION.
- Pegula will never beat any of the top players, in a Slam final, because the draw riggers have no confidence that she can even play tennis. Which is the reason why every tournament, her entire draw consist of opponents from the KIDDIE department. Just like Iga, Sabalenka, and some of the other tops on tour, they consistenly get hard draws, which helps them get better. When someone has to cheat to help you, it only weakens you as a players. Because you do not know what part of your game needs improvement.
- Those Doping Agents are controlled by the American Government. It an American players test is hot, they are going to sweep it under the carpet.
- Djokovic is the GOAT. He has the most Slams. Simple as that.
- "It’s difficult to say we don’t agree” Correction: It’s difficult to say [ I ] don’t agree. While she is an intelligent and well educated person, she may not be all that aware of certain character flaws. Perhaps a psychologist or ten might be of some help?
- Sabalenka should ignore that nonsense and continue doing what she does. The sport of tennis has been corrupted by the American government. And America is the most racist country on earth. It is clear that some players are being targeted for discrimination based on their nationality. Screaming hasn't just start in tennis. Sharapova, Serena, etc. always did scream and nothing was said. You cannot control ignorance.
- If she wants privacy, then she should quit tennis. The same thing happened to Sabalenka at the US Open after she loss the final, and no one was talking about privacy. Instead they criticized Sabalenka. Anyone who knows Gauff is well aware that she is a sore loser and cannot control her anger after a loss. You cannot tell someone where to place their cameras. She needs to separate herself from her parents and GROW UP. She is 21 years old.
- Coco is a sore loser. She does that all the time. At least now, she goes behind closed doors, instead of interrupting the matches with her meltdown. The same thing happened to Sabalenka at the US Open. The only difference is, Sabalenka knows how to handle things like an adult. Gauff on the other hand needs to GROW UP. She is 21 and she needs to act like it. There is no way you can play a sport and cannot stand to lose.
- No one is interested in seeing her. She is not going to do anything but cheat a younger player out of a wildcard and lose in the first round. If their lives is that miserable and they want to return, let them go thru qualifications like everyone else.
- She never ever screams in practice. Not ever.
Loading