“We are working on the matter”: French Director explains why Ugo Humbert’s absence could lead to potential sanctions
ATPThursday, 29 January 2026 at 22:00
The National Technical Director of the French Tennis Federation, Didier Retière, criticised Ugo Humbert’s decision to prioritise the ATP calendar instead of representing France in the Davis Cup.
The former world No. 13 announced a few days ago that he will not be part of the French team and will skip the first-round qualifier at home against Slovakia, which will be played next weekend, on February 7–8, on indoor hard courts at Le Chaudron.
Currently ranked world No. 33, Humbert added several tournaments to his calendar and is expected to compete next week at the Open Occitanie in Montpellier. The following weeks will be packed with tournaments for the 27-year-old, who will then play the Rotterdam Open, Doha, and Dubai.
Humbert is looking to regain positions in the rankings, especially at a time when he is defending a significant number of points and risks continuing to fall in the rankings, potentially even dropping out of the top 50 if he fails to collect wins in the coming weeks.
“After discussing this with my team, I’ve made the difficult decision not to participate in the next Davis Cup tie,” Humbert posted on Instagram on Saturday. “To tackle this first part of the season and maintain my goals, I’ve chosen to focus on the upcoming tournaments, especially on indoor hard courts.”
Read also
This time, the response came from France’s National Technical Director in an interview with AFP, where he expressed regret over Humbert’s decision. “Obviously, we are a little sad,” he stated in conversation with L'Equipe. “Team competitions leave an incredible mark on the lives of players, on the life of the Federation, on the life of the public and clubs. When you start playing tennis, of course the ambition is to become a professional player. But it must also include the fact of wearing the tricolour jersey.”
The decision to skip the tie after having already been confirmed in the initial squad could lead to sanctions for the player, something that will be decided by the President of the French Tennis Federation. “It’s up to the president of the FFT, Gilles Moretton, to make the decision. We are disappointed. We are working on the matter.”
Beyond Humbert’s disappointing decision for the French team, Retière lamented the existing tension between the ATP calendar and the Davis Cup, which forces players to make a difficult decision every time they are called up to represent their countries—often sacrificing tournaments that are part of their regular schedule.
“At some point, the competition has become less readable,” he admitted. “So obviously, players also ask themselves questions. With the growing weight of the calendar and tournaments, it has become difficult for them to reconcile everything. That’s why it’s not black or white. But indeed, I think the format has not made things any easier.”
Read also
"When I was playing, that didn’t happen"
The French team will face Slovakia and initially announced a squad of four players: Arthur Rinderknech (No. 28) as the first singles player, along with Ugo Humbert (No. 33), Benjamin Bonzi (No. 106), and doubles specialist Pierre-Hugues Herbert (No. 65). However, Humbert’s withdrawal leaves the team—for now—with only three representatives.
The Slovak team, for their part, will feature Lukas Klein (No. 136), Alex Molcan (No. 206), Norbert Gombos (No. 303), Milos Karol (No. 446), and Lukas Pokorny (No. 522).
A few days earlier, team coach Ivan Ljubičić expressed his regret at losing the player who had been slated as the team’s second singles option. “It’s sad. We are all sad. For me, the Davis Cup has always been very important. And in France, I had the feeling that it was the most important thing for all the players.”
“Obviously, that is not the case. So there you have it—we will have to play without him. Also, it seems a bit strange to me to have a main tour tournament in France at the same time as a French team match. When I was playing, that didn’t happen. We had weeks with only the Davis Cup.”
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- "It’s difficult to say we don’t agree” Correction: It’s difficult to say [ I ] don’t agree. While she is an intelligent and well educated person, she may not be all that aware of certain character flaws. Perhaps a psychologist or ten might be of some help?
- Sabalenka should ignore that nonsense and continue doing what she does. The sport of tennis has been corrupted by the American government. And America is the most racist country on earth. It is clear that some players are being targeted for discrimination based on their nationality. Screaming hasn't just start in tennis. Sharapova, Serena, etc. always did scream and nothing was said. You cannot control ignorance.
- If she wants privacy, then she should quit tennis. The same thing happened to Sabalenka at the US Open after she loss the final, and no one was talking about privacy. Instead they criticized Sabalenka. Anyone who knows Gauff is well aware that she is a sore loser and cannot control her anger after a loss. You cannot tell someone where to place their cameras. She needs to separate herself from her parents and GROW UP. She is 21 years old.
- Coco is a sore loser. She does that all the time. At least now, she goes behind closed doors, instead of interrupting the matches with her meltdown. The same thing happened to Sabalenka at the US Open. The only difference is, Sabalenka knows how to handle things like an adult. Gauff on the other hand needs to GROW UP. She is 21 and she needs to act like it. There is no way you can play a sport and cannot stand to lose.
- No one is interested in seeing her. She is not going to do anything but cheat a younger player out of a wildcard and lose in the first round. If their lives is that miserable and they want to return, let them go thru qualifications like everyone else.
- She never ever screams in practice. Not ever.
- I'm amazed at the freedom cameras have on courts as well. In the past, cross-court cameras were vividly showing what amounted to "upskirts" as women sat on their respective benches. The players resorted to placing towels between or over their legs. A practice still in play today. Same with camera's habits of basically zooming-in on down-blouse shots. That seems to have lessened; at least no more zooming-in as they bend forward prepping to face an opponent's serve. In addition, the invasion of privacy during medical treatment on-court is absurd. As are the in-your-face close-ups of players at their bench. If I were seeking a moment to concentrate or simply relax between games I'd trash that camera in a nanosecond.
- Talking about that situation with the American Dictator is one thing. Taking action is another. When is both the ATP and WTA is going to hand down punishment to the American athletes like they did with the Russians and Belarusians?, They took no time mixing sports with politics when it came to Ukraine. Right now, it is showing that the sport of tennis is actually controlled by the American Government. That is why there is so much Corruption going on.
- PLACED IN THE SEMIS IS RIGHT. BECAUSE UNLIKE ALL THE OTHER PLAYERS, PEGULA IS NEVER GIVEN ANY QUALITY OPPONENTS IN HER SECTION OF THE DRAW. THEREFORE IT HELPS HER TO GO DEEP INTO THE DRAWS. BY THE TIME SHE MEETS UP WITH A QUALITY OPPONENT, HER OPPONENT IS EXHAUSTED FROM THE PREVIOUS MATCH. IT IS CALLED DRAW FIXING. AND THAT AMERICAN BACK WTA IS FULL OF CORRUPTION. AND HAS RUINED WOMEN TENNIS. PEGULA DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE BODY BUILD TO LIFT A TROPHY. THEREFORE THEY DO WHAT AMERICANS DO BEST. IF YOU CANNOT EARN IT, CHEAT AND STEAL IT.
- THERE IS NOTHING TO TELL HER. AS USUAL, THE DRAWS WERE DESIGNED TO HELP PEGULA LIFT THE TROPHY. UNLIKE, EVERYONE ELSE ALL PEGULA OPPONENTS CAME OFF OUT OF THE JUNIOR SECTION.
Loading