Curren beating McEnroe QF Wimbledon 1985. Then beat Connors in semi. Both matches ridiculously one sided. Remember it well
Tennis Throwback: John McEnroe encouraged Wimbledon surface change after losing 1985 quarterfinal, "It’s not tennis anymore"
Tennis NewsTuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:39
After his defeat to Kevin Curren in the quarterfinal of Wimbledon 1985, John McEnroe encouraged a change to the surface at the grasscourt major as he spoke of how tennis was changing.
The American, who has seven Grand Slam titles to his name, went into Wimbledon 1985 as the two-time defending champion, having won the major in both 1983 and 1984. He had also reached the final for six consecutive years from 1979 onwards.
However, this turned out to be the year that McEnroe's impressive streak was ended as he suffered a shock defeat to 1982 US Open champion Curren in the quarterfinal.
McEnroe complained of "one-shot deal"
Following this, McEnroe complained about the evolution of tennis at the 1985 US Open and encouraged a surface change on grass to move with the times.
"It’s not tennis anymore. You get a guy like [Kevin] Curren or [Boris] Becker, a big server, and it becomes a one-shot deal. It’s not going to happen in my career, but Wimbledon is going to have to change [surfaces]. Otherwise, you’ll have 16 Beckers in the round of 16. Who wants to see everybody ace everybody else?
"They shouldn’t keep things the same just because of the fact they have been there in the past. Players are different, stronger, today. In basketball, if players started to grow to 7-6 and could dunk standing on their feet, wouldn’t you expect them to do something?" he said.
Curren advanced to the final of Wimbledon in 1985, where he faced Boris Becker. The match went to four sets, but the German player ultimately defeated Curren to take his maiden grasscourt title 6-3, 6-7(4), 7-6(3), 6-4.
Meanwhile, McEnroe continued to compete until 1994 in singles and 2006 in doubles but never won another singles title at a Grand Slam. However, he did achieve the doubles title at the US Open in 1989 and at Wimbledon in 1992.
claps 0visitors 94
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Why do you even publish this TwatCaster's PATHETIC stunt for attention? There's plenty of reasons why imbeciles like him are 'talking' and people like Iga Swiatek are 'walking the walk'. Tennisuptodate should be above this tripe.
mandoist16-12-2024 - If and when Political Correctness and gullible hearts over-rule BIOLOGY, the Human world begins its already seeming decline.mandoist15-12-2024
- The new generation has arrived and these guys need to do it with the left overs.
AceOfBase13-12-2024 - Every young, inexperiend CEO has "better" ideas (and friends to hire).mandoist12-12-2024
- What a load of nonsense. Emotional stress definitely didn’t cause her wrist or ankle injuries.Lyca10-12-2024
- Taylor Fritz 🎾 – the surprising third for many. 🎄 A great Christmas tree quiz question! 🎅✨MrAndreeva10-12-2024
- Simona Halep taking the axe out 🪓😮💨MrAndreeva08-12-2024
- ITIA is literally a Secret Organization. Way past time for a neutral entity to oversee, if not guide, these Elitists within ITIA whom enjoy their ability to keep their "investigations" in a business as usual format behind closed doors!!mandoist08-12-2024
- Poor Emma has 3 problems I can see from the peanut gallery: 1. She has not shown the comittment it takes; tennis has not been her priority. 2. Her body seems to fail. Frailty is not an athlete's friend. 3. She is throwing everything at the wall to keep her sponsors.mandoist07-12-2024
- As for ITIA -- who, or what entity, oversees this untrustworthy organization?? Too many recent cases of suspensions over tests proving minimal stats at best. Neither Iga nor Simona showed even a hint at prolonged use. Sinner, we don't know because the secrecy was extreme. Now we find ITIA flat-out LIED about speaking directly with the manufacturer of the drug in question associated with Iga. Are we to believe ITIA can be trusted? Not according to the past few years of questionable corporate conduct. ITIA can no longer be trusted to fairly regulate nor investigate itself... so who or what will??mandoist06-12-2024
