
Hosting the Australian Open has become one of Victoria’s most significant long-term sporting commitments, backed by sustained public investment and an agreement with Tennis Australia whose full details remain out of public view. While the state government insists the tournament delivers clear economic returns, the scale and structure of that investment continue to attract scrutiny.
Unlike the Australian Grand Prix, where Victoria pays a hosting fee that climbed to $102 million in 2024, Tennis Australia maintains that no equivalent payment exists for staging the Australian Open. However, taxpayers have still contributed more than $1 billion since 2011 to upgrade Melbourne Park, ensuring the venue meets world-class standards and securing the tournament’s future in Melbourne until at least 2046.
The agreement between the state and Tennis Australia includes commitments to spend $972 million over a decade on infrastructure improvements, a program completed in 2021. That arrangement was further extended during the COVID-19 pandemic, when a $106 million state-government bailout locked the event in for an additional 20 years. Despite the lack of transparency surrounding the contract itself, Tennis Australia continues to emphasise the Open’s financial independence and broader value.
“The AO stands on its own two feet financially as well as making a major contribution to the Victorian economy. It is also the major revenue source for Tennis Australia to fund the sport and facilities throughout Australia,” a Tennis Australia spokesperson said.
Ongoing investment has not stopped there. The Melbourne and Olympic Parks Trust, which manages the precinct, reported spending at least $20 million on tennis-related upgrades during the 2024 financial year. These works included improvements to the retractable roof at John Cain Arena and the addition of new plunge pools and ice baths for players at Rod Laver Arena. A further $45 million was invested last year to ensure Melbourne Park “continues to meet Grand Slam standards” while supporting year-round events.
Read also
Economic impact, public spending and growing oversight
Melbourne Park now hosts more than 500 events annually, ranging from major concerts to rugby, football, basketball and netball. Tennis Australia remains the precinct’s largest tenant, paying $68.7 million last year in rent and associated expenses. According to Tennis Australia, the Open generated a “total expenditure stimulus” of $565.8 million last year, with projections suggesting the figure will exceed $600 million this year.
KPMG chief economist Brendan Rynne expressed confidence in the event’s overall return on investment but urged caution when interpreting headline figures. He warned that including spending by Melbourne locals—who made up 63 per cent of spectators—could overstate the true economic benefit, as that money would likely have been spent elsewhere regardless.
Read also
Still, Rynne highlighted intangible benefits that defy traditional measurement. “That positive feeling of knowing that we are one of the global destinations like London, like Paris and like New York; that we’re held in top-tier regard. There’s a sense of goodwill and positiveness associated with that,” he said, adding that the Open also strengthens Melbourne’s reputation as a destination capable of hosting major global events.
With the Victorian Auditor-General set to review state spending on major events in the 2026–27 financial year, the balance between public investment, transparency and long-term benefit is once again under the spotlight.
Read also

Cristhián AvilaTennis Journalist
Cristhián Ávila is a tennis journalist based in Santiago, Chile, and has been part of the TennisUpToDate team since early 2023. He covers the ATP and WTA Tours as well as all four Grand Slams, producing breaking news, match reports, analysis, and regular liveblogs from major tournaments.
His reporting combines statistical analysis with clear explanation, helping readers understand tactical developments, player form, and broader storylines across the tour. Working fluently in both Spanish and English, Cristhián collaborates with an international editorial team and contributes to comprehensive global coverage. As part of his work, he has conducted interviews and media interactions with leading figures in the sport, including Caroline Wozniacki and John McEnroe.
In his journalism, Cristhián places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. His coverage is grounded in research, context, and direct engagement with professional tennis.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Wtf? Why is there no reason? And what about the men's?Bel08-11-2026
- One step by another step -- WTA continues to 'lose the plot'. Too many hi-tech microphones being installed at most venues!!! Remove them (especially those along the hallways, sidewalks, and pathways throughout the venues. Not to mention (most of all) remove the mic's from the Players/Coaches Box.
mandoist06-11-2026 - Enough of her bullshit. Go marry someone.
mandoist06-11-2026 - Don't you just love this young lady!? We fans often expect athletes to be supermen and superwomen, often forgetting that they WILL GET TIRED! I love Alex's perspective. Tiredness for an athlete should never be viewed as a negative, especially if you are healthy, taking care of your body and mental health and putting in the work. What a mature perspective. Good for you, Alex!Rapunzel05-11-2026
- Jess is absolutely correct! But the disrespect is a trait I have noticed in most of the Russian players. Mirra is good but very immature and lacks humility. Conceivable needs to get a handle on that!Rapunzel05-11-2026
- Having spent weeks and weeks through the years on tour, I can say with confidence that Conchita was (is) one of the very few who realize the surprising level of maturity (and sometimes lack of) which Mirra seems to have developed in such a demanding adult world of Pro-Tennis. While at the same time reminding herself (Conchita, that is) that Mirra is still young and developing mentally and physically. The general public may forget at times, or not at all realize, these modern era young athletes do not have a 'normal' Youth. It's a major sacrifice, among countless sacrifices, these athletes must make. People who blow-off that fact are ignorant and unfair when they blurt out, "They choose fame so they have to put up with the intrusions on their lives". No, they do not.
mandoist05-11-2026 - Okay... someone with a camera was EAVESDROPPING on a private conversation. Shouldn't that be the point of discussion here? Regardless of the sensationalist crap by media, Pegula (and anyone) has a right to an opinion. There used to be an expectation that private conversations were respected, regardless of 'stardom' and whatever other defensive excuses media tries to shove in our faces. Boo-hoo if feelings are hurt. BTW: Having been employed at various tourney venues, etc., I can't tell you how nasty and offensive players can be when discussing their opponents and colleagues... in "private". Well, I could, but won't. I also challenge anyone to deny what Jessica said is false.
mandoist05-11-2026 - Vacherot is Mongasque, rather than Swiss. The tournament was Swiss :DTrwd7702-11-2026
- After a couple decades traveling to IIHF tourneys overseas... our family is done with it... and I will not be the only one!! Bad enough the NHL allows Ovachenko (a Putin Supporter and Campaigner) to live and play in the USA. Let's not forget the STATE SPONSORED RUSSIAN DOPING PROGRAMS still in effect today.
mandoist31-10-2026 - Osaka's mental state apparently does not allow her to reach any more Quarter Finals? I mean, she doesn't really have the time for tennis with all the pre-planning that must go into her 12 year-old "fashion" goals.
mandoist29-10-2026









