ATP Miami Open Round-Up Day Three | Carlos Alcaraz too strong for Fonseca as Draper falls in tiebreak heartbreak
ATPSaturday, 21 March 2026 at 04:28
Second-round action at the Miami Open delivered a packed day of high-level matches, with Carlos Alcaraz, Taylor Fritz, Matteo Berrettini, Arthur Fils and Tommy Paul all advancing. Among the standout results, Reilly Opelka defeated Jack Draper in two tiebreaks, while Stefanos Tsitsipas produced one of the biggest upsets of the day by overcoming Alex de Minaur.
The results carry significant context across the draw. Alcaraz continues his steady run as one of the title favourites, while Fritz and Paul keep American hopes alive. Berrettini’s form remains encouraging as he builds consistency, and Tsitsipas’ win over a top-10 opponent signals a potential resurgence. Draper, meanwhile, exits despite not facing a single break point in his match.
Alcaraz maintains control against Fonseca
Carlos Alcaraz 6-4, 6-4 Joao Fonseca
Carlos Alcaraz delivered a controlled and efficient performance to defeat Joao Fonseca in straight sets, relying on early initiative and consistent serving. The Spaniard broke early in both sets, allowing him to dictate the tempo without needing to chase the match at any stage.
Fonseca remained competitive, particularly behind his first serve, but struggled to generate pressure on return. Alcaraz’s ability to win 80% of first-serve points and hold all his service games proved decisive. The Brazilian had a single break opportunity in the second set but could not convert, limiting his chances of shifting momentum.
Tactically, Alcaraz controlled baseline exchanges, especially in longer rallies where his movement and shot selection forced errors. Fonseca attempted to shorten points but lacked consistency in execution. With this win, Alcaraz advances to face Sebastian Korda in the third round. His performance suggests a steady build in form, maintaining control without needing to over
Match Statistics Carlos Alcaraz vs. Joao Fonseca
| Carlos Alcaraz | VS | Joao Fonseca |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 8 | Aces | 5 |
| 3 | Double Faults | 2 |
| 70% (44/63) | 1st Service Percentage | 63% (42/67) |
| 80% (35/44) | 1st Service Points Won | 67% (28/42) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Service Points Won | 48% (12/25) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Saved | 60% (3/5) |
| 100% (10/10) | Service Games | 80% (8/10) |
| Return | ||
| 33% (14/42) | 1st Return Points Won | 20% (9/44) |
| 52% (13/25) | 2nd Return Points Won | 47% (9/19) |
Fritz edges tight decider against Van de Zandschulp
Taylor Fritz 6-3, 6-7, 6-3 Botic van de Zandschulp
Matteo Berrettini produced a composed and structured performance to defeat Alexander Bublik in straight sets. The Italian secured early breaks in both sets, which allowed him to play from the front throughout the match.
Both players served well, but Berrettini’s efficiency in key moments made the difference. He struck 16 aces and won 76% of points on his first serve, while crucially not facing a single break point. Bublik, despite solid serving numbers, was unable to convert pressure into real opportunities.
Berrettini’s tactical approach centred on aggressive first-strike tennis, using his forehand to shorten rallies and avoid giving Bublik rhythm. The Kazakh player’s variation did not disrupt the Italian’s consistency. With this win, Berrettini continues to build momentum and moves into the third round with a stable level across all phases of play.
Match Statistics Botic van de Zandschulp vs. Taylor Fritz
| Botic van de Zandschulp | VS | Taylor Fritz |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 10 | Aces | 18 |
| 1 | Double Faults | 2 |
| 56% (53/95) | 1st Service Percentage | 64% (58/90) |
| 83% (44/53) | 1st Service Points Won | 83% (48/58) |
| 43% (18/42) | 2nd Service Points Won | 59% (19/32) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Saved | 100% (2/2) |
| 86% (12/14) | Service Games | 100% (16/16) |
| Return | ||
| 17% (10/58) | 1st Return Points Won | 17% (9/53) |
| 41% (13/32) | 2nd Return Points Won | 57% (24/42) |
Berrettini too strong for Bublik
Matteo Berrettini 6-4, 6-4 Alexander Bublik
Matteo Berrettini produced a controlled and efficient performance to defeat Alexander Bublik in straight sets. The Italian established his advantage early in both sets, securing breaks that allowed him to dictate the structure of the match from the outset.
Serving played a decisive role, with Berrettini striking 16 aces and winning 76% of points behind his first serve. Importantly, he did not face a single break point, which allowed him to maintain scoreboard pressure throughout. Bublik, despite a solid first-serve percentage, was unable to convert his service strength into meaningful opportunities on return.
Tactically, Berrettini focused on first-strike tennis, using his forehand to control points early and avoid extended rallies where Bublik could introduce variation. The Kazakh’s unpredictability did not disrupt the Italian’s rhythm. Berrettini advances to the third round with a performance built on consistency and efficiency, reinforcing his current upward trajectory.
Match Statistics Alexander Bublik vs. Matteo Berrettini
| Alexander Bublik | VS | Matteo Berrettini |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 5 | Aces | 17 |
| 3 | Double Faults | 1 |
| 64% (41/64) | 1st Service Percentage | 63% (45/72) |
| 76% (31/41) | 1st Service Points Won | 76% (34/45) |
| 48% (11/23) | 2nd Service Points Won | 56% (15/27) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Saved | 100% (6/6) |
| 80% (8/10) | Service Games | 100% (10/10) |
| Return | ||
| 24% (11/45) | 1st Return Points Won | 24% (10/41) |
| 44% (12/27) | 2nd Return Points Won | 52% (12/23) |
Opelka edges Draper in serve-dominated clash
Reilly Opelka 7-6, 7-6 Jack Draper
Reilly Opelka defeated Jack Draper in a match dominated by serving, with both sets decided in tiebreaks. Neither player faced sustained pressure, and break opportunities were almost entirely absent throughout the contest.
Draper did not face a single break point, while Opelka faced only one, highlighting the level of serving on both sides. The outcome ultimately came down to the tiebreaks, where Opelka proved more effective.
The American struck 24 aces and won 87% of points behind his first serve, consistently placing Draper under pressure. In both tiebreaks, Opelka secured early mini-breaks and managed his service points efficiently to close out each set. Draper’s performance was solid across all areas, but the inability to gain even minimal traction on return limited his chances. Opelka advances to the third round, where his serve will remain a key factor.
Match Statistics Jack Draper vs. Reilly Opelka
| Jack Draper | VS | Reilly Opelka |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 7 | Aces | 25 |
| 1 | Double Faults | 2 |
| 66% (45/68) | 1st Service Percentage | 74% (54/73) |
| 82% (37/45) | 1st Service Points Won | 87% (47/54) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Service Points Won | 58% (11/19) |
| - (0/0) | Break Points Saved | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (12/12) | Service Games | 100% (12/12) |
| Return | ||
| 13% (7/54) | 1st Return Points Won | 18% (8/45) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Return Points Won | 39% (9/23) |
Paul recovers to defeat Mannarino
Tommy Paul 6-2, 2-6, 6-4 Adrian Mannarino
Tommy Paul progressed after a match that featured clear shifts in momentum across all three sets. He dominated the opener with aggressive baseline play and early breaks, but Mannarino responded in the second set by applying greater pressure on return.
The deciding set saw Paul fall behind before regaining control. He recovered from a break down and won five of the last six games, applying sustained pressure and capitalising on key moments. His ability to reset after the second set proved decisive.
Paul’s return game was particularly effective, winning 40% of first-serve return points. Mannarino struggled to maintain consistency in longer rallies, especially as the match progressed into the final stages. Paul advances to the third round with a performance that demonstrated resilience and adaptability under changing match conditions.
Match Statistics Tommy Paul vs. Adrian Mannarino
| Tommy Paul | VS | Adrian Mannarino |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 6 | Aces | 4 |
| 2 | Double Faults | 2 |
| 62% (41/66) | 1st Service Percentage | 64% (56/87) |
| 76% (31/41) | 1st Service Points Won | 61% (34/56) |
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Service Points Won | 58% (18/31) |
| 0% (0/3) | Break Points Saved | 43% (3/7) |
| 77% (10/13) | Service Games | 69% (9/13) |
| Return | ||
| 39% (22/56) | 1st Return Points Won | 24% (10/41) |
| 42% (13/31) | 2nd Return Points Won | 42% (11/26) |
Tsitsipas stuns De Minaur with serving masterclass
Stefanos Tsitsipas 6-3, 7-6 Alex de Minaur
Stefanos Tsitsipas produced one of his most complete performances in recent months to defeat Alex de Minaur in straight sets, securing a notable top-10 victory. The Greek controlled the match largely through his serve, building the foundation for a result that rarely came under threat.
Tsitsipas struck five aces and won an exceptional 98% of points behind his first serve (39/40), a statistic that defined the match. He dropped just eight points on serve overall and did not concede a single break, saving both break points he faced. De Minaur, typically one of the most consistent returners on tour, was unable to apply sustained pressure.
The opening set was decided by a single break, with Tsitsipas capitalising on one of his limited opportunities. From there, he maintained control through efficient service games and disciplined baseline play. De Minaur improved his level in the second set, pushing it to a tiebreak, but Tsitsipas remained composed in the decisive moments.
The Greek’s ability to dictate with his first serve and shorten points prevented De Minaur from engaging in longer rallies, where the Australian is usually most effective. With this result, Tsitsipas records his second top-10 win of the season and sets up a third-round clash with Arthur Fils.
Match Statistics Stefanos Tsitsipas vs. Alex de Minaur
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | VS | Alex de Minaur |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 5 | Aces | 2 |
| 1 | Double Faults | 2 |
| 71% (40/56) | 1st Service Percentage | 63% (44/70) |
| 98% (39/40) | 1st Service Points Won | 64% (28/44) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Service Points Won | 59% (16/27) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Points Saved | 80% (4/5) |
| 100% (11/11) | Service Games | 90% (9/10) |
| Return | ||
| 36% (16/44) | 1st Return Points Won | 3% (1/40) |
| 41% (11/27) | 2nd Return Points Won | 44% (7/16) |
Fils advances with authority
Arthur Fils 6-2, 6-3 Darwin Blanch
Arthur Fils secured a straightforward victory, controlling the match from the opening games. The Frenchman imposed his level early, using aggressive baseline play to take time away from his opponent and limit any opportunity for rhythm.
Fils applied consistent pressure in return games, converting break opportunities efficiently and ensuring he remained ahead throughout both sets. Blanch struggled to respond to the pace and depth, particularly when drawn into extended rallies.
The Frenchman’s serving was solid, allowing him to consolidate breaks without difficulty. His ability to maintain intensity across the match prevented any shifts in momentum. Fils advances to the third round, where he will face Stefanos Tsitsipas in a more demanding test.
Match Statistics Arthur Fils vs. Darwin Blanch
| Arthur Fils | VS | Darwin Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 4 | Aces | 3 |
| 2 | Double Faults | 1 |
| 65% (31/48) | 1st Service Percentage | 68% (43/63) |
| 81% (25/31) | 1st Service Points Won | 67% (29/43) |
| 76% (13/17) | 2nd Service Points Won | 30% (6/20) |
| - (0/0) | Break Points Saved | 73% (8/11) |
| 100% (9/9) | Service Games | 63% (5/8) |
| Return | ||
| 33% (14/43) | 1st Return Points Won | 19% (6/31) |
| 70% (14/20) | 2nd Return Points Won | 24% (4/17) |
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Sab has more disappointments to come. She's more or less been 'skating' by many of her opponents. Perhaps less Social Media, TV commercials, and photo-ops... otherwise those distractions will gaurantee a slide in ranking. Take that hint from the downfall of some of her colleagues.
- No kidding. Obviously this did not cross an editor's cubicle. Other than the mediocre grammar... there are more comma's in this mess than in 'War and Peace' !!
- Sketchy chair ump in Eala's match. I lost count how many times Siegemund walked to her box and talked between serves!!
- WTF is wrong with you people at WTA?? The Williams Freebies have gone on far too long!! WTA is resembling a certain Orange President who feels he is free to do as he pleases; and does so despite the fact the entire world knows this game of 'untouchables' is not going to end well for any of these Losers.
- Why is this article so poorly written, and seeming not proofread?
- Lena ends any "rivalry" talk today
- It's embarrassing how tennis media (especially this rag) refuses to give Doubles their due respect. Considering Siniakova's 11 hours of tennis in 3 days -- then winning the Indian Wells Doubles Title -- one would think an alleged tennis news source would highlight it.
- Yeah, Gilbert's a real expert on "mental" advice.
- Agree or disagree with whatever personal deterrents and/or denials exist in Emma World... one thing no one can argue is... she has wasted her most important period of development in tennis. It's a shame her Nanny(s) never taught her how to work well with others -- including those darn coaches always "telling me what to do".
- Rybakina could have finished that guy off... but he tucked his tail and quit.
Loading