“I feel quite positive”: Alexander Zverev assesses form ahead of Monte-Carlo Masters 2026
ATPMonday, 06 April 2026 at 06:30
Alexander Zverev arrives at the 2026 Monte-Carlo Masters with solid results behind him, even if the title he was chasing never came. The world No. 3 reached back-to-back semifinals at Indian Wells and the Miami Open, maintaining a consistent level during the Sunshine Double.
Those results reinforce his position among the leading players on tour, but they also underline a familiar pattern. Zverev has been regularly present in the final stages of major events, yet still searching for the performances that convert those runs into titles, especially against the very top names.
In Miami, that gap was visible again in his defeat to Jannik Sinner, who went on to win the title and complete the Sunshine Double. Zverev remained competitive throughout, but the key moments tilted away from him, a theme that has defined several of his biggest matches in recent months.
Now, the focus shifts to clay. Monte-Carlo opens the European swing, bringing a change in conditions but also a return to a surface that has been part of Zverev’s development since his early years in Hamburg.
Read also
Encouraging signs despite missed opportunity
Zverev’s assessment of the Sunshine Double was measured. The results were strong, but not fully satisfying. Reaching two Masters 1000 semifinals suggests consistency, yet for a player of his ranking, the expectation remains higher. “I feel quite positive, of course. I would have loved to win an event," he said to Tennis Channel. "I feel like in Miami especially, I played really good tennis.”
His semifinal in Miami, particularly against Sinner, offered both positives and frustration. Zverev felt the match was tighter than the scoreline indicated, pointing to missed chances that could have shifted momentum, especially in the second set.
“The match with Jannik was maybe closer than the score suggested. I had my chances in the second set, but he won both tournaments. He was playing unbelievable tennis. Best player in the world, for sure, on hard courts at the moment. He deserved everything.”
Beyond results, Zverev highlighted changes in his game. He has been working toward a more proactive style, looking to dictate points earlier and play with greater intent from the baseline, something he believes is starting to show.
“The things that I worked on are starting to pay off. I’ve been trying to play a bit more aggressively and take the game on myself more. In those aspects, it was a positive few weeks.”
Adjusting to clay after quick turnaround
The switch from hard courts in North America to clay in Europe comes with little time to reset. Zverev allowed himself a short break before returning to training in Monte-Carlo, following a schedule that reflects how tight the calendar becomes after deep runs.
“I took three days off and then started training on Tuesday afternoon here in Monte Carlo. We’re all getting ready for the tournament. We don’t have that much time, but that’s a positive thing because that means that you played well in Miami and in the tournaments leading up to this event.”
Although clay is a familiar surface, Zverev stressed that the adjustment is never automatic. Movement, positioning, and point construction all shift, even for players who grew up on it. “You still have to get used to it. You still have to play in a different way. I’m happy to be on the surface and happy to hopefully be playing good tennis again soon.”
Tactically, he expects some continuity. While clay typically pushes players further behind the baseline, Zverev believes the improvements he has made in ball speed and aggression can still translate. “You play different on clay for sure. I think you maybe play a bit deeper in the court, but ball speed is one thing that I really worked on and on clay court I can still use that the same way.”
The start of the clay season also brings renewed attention to the physical demands of the tour. Zverev pointed to the number of withdrawals in Monte-Carlo as part of a broader issue, suggesting the schedule itself plays a significant role in the strain players experience.
“I think the surface is relevant. I think it’s our schedule more that puts us into suffering than anything else. We see how many pull-outs there are, unfortunately, here again. It’s something that I think needs to be reviewed.”
Cristhián AvilaTennis Journalist
Cristhián Ávila is a tennis journalist based in Santiago, Chile, and has been part of the TennisUpToDate team since early 2023. He covers the ATP and WTA Tours as well as all four Grand Slams, producing breaking news, match reports, analysis, and regular liveblogs from major tournaments.
His reporting combines statistical analysis with clear explanation, helping readers understand tactical developments, player form, and broader storylines across the tour. Working fluently in both Spanish and English, Cristhián collaborates with an international editorial team and contributes to comprehensive global coverage. As part of his work, he has conducted interviews and media interactions with leading figures in the sport, including Caroline Wozniacki and John McEnroe.
In his journalism, Cristhián places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. His coverage is grounded in research, context, and direct engagement with professional tennis.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Illness? Sure, sick over the fact she's run out of legit coaches. Also, perhaps another bout of allergies to 'work' and instruction.
- Two major problems with sports (and Life) in today's world... 1. Self-imposed "experts" like Gilbert, Clijsters, and Stubbs can't keep their nasty opinions and rumors to themselves. They feel a need to talk about things they have no relation to, nor a clue. 2. People & anti-Social Media.
- Anyone else notice how general mental & physical fatigue is a major issue now, given WTA's ignorant refusal to consider the stress of their idiotic scheduling and additional demands??
- What a load of bullshit. Artur Szostaczko failed to mention that he didn't get hired!!
- Almost condescending. BTW: That was another anti-climactic Final compared to several of the excellent pre-Final matches.
- Sounds like maybe a mental health break? Miss her on the tour. My favorite American female player. Hurry back Emma!
- Why are microphones even allowed in front of the coaching boxes??? In this age of hi-tech, whatever is heard (strategy or otherwise) can instantly be relayed to any given opponent. How and why did WTA decide to slip this past everyone? Also, these strategic placements of mic's is obvious stupidity initiating a commentator's personal decision to expound upon -- and apologize for -- foul language, etc., when a player or team member curses, etc. Then media pounces upon every off-color phrase or word in their sensationalistic "news coverage". This practice of literally -- and openly -- eavesdropping needs to stop!!
- So she actually CAN think clearly! If she wants to play tennis, make it a priority. Learn from Life choices (like having a kid with her rapper ex). Today's game is a grueling exercise in Humility if one is not fully dedicated; or does not have the time to do The Work. Raducanu is a shining example of someone with the talent but lacks the drive, attitude, and/or devotion it takes to maintain 100% capacity of everything the Tour demands.
- It's as if troubled 'Condescending Collins' is competing with The Williams' for the daily spotlight. Some just do not know when to quit. Go fix yourselves and stop informing the public of your personal problems. The general public has their own issues in Life.
- Coach Macci and Martina Navratilova are seemingly the only reasonable voices coming out of the tennis circuit in regards to Iga at the moment. People like Stubbs, Gilbert, and anti-Social Media dwellers have very little or nothing to offer. What they are indeed is... predictable. Why certain media think their input is of value is a mystery. Perhaps easy filler for their publications? Media, in general, could/should consider their poor choices and lazy habits of running to the Loudest Mouths for "expert advice". Certain Internet 'news sources' might do their own research and STOP COPYING & PASTING the first articles to hit the web with little-to-no editing or true journalism. As for Iga (and any athlete) they are not robots. They are Human Beings and Humans, as we all know, are not infallable. Leave the expert criticisms and "solutions" to these athletes and their teams. Disgruntled bettors and so-called "experts" are not a solution!
Loading