“It would be magical”: Stan Wawrinka could face Carlos Alcaraz in Monte-Carlo second round
ATPSunday, 05 April 2026 at 06:30
Stan Wawrinka enters the Monte-Carlo Masters with a defined objective and a clear physical ceiling. At 41, the Swiss is navigating the final months of his professional career, balancing competitive intent with the limitations he has openly acknowledged. Monte-Carlo, where he lifted his only Masters 1000 title in 2014, now becomes a symbolic stop in what he has already confirmed as his last season on tour.
The immediate focus is his opening-round match against Sebastián Báez. A win would carry broader significance beyond progression, potentially setting up a second-round meeting with world No. 1 Carlos Alcaraz — a match-up that has never taken place. It is a scenario Wawrinka has referenced repeatedly in recent weeks, framing it as one of the few remaining experiences he would still like to have before retiring.
His season has been measured rather than consistent. Wawrinka arrives with a 6–9 record in 2026 and recently lost in the opening round of the Naples Challenger to Matteo Martineau. Earlier in the year, he reached the third round of the Australian Open and was part of Switzerland’s run to the United Cup final, with Belinda Bencic leading the team’s strongest results.
The ranking context reflects his current position. Wawrinka is ranked world No. 98 and is projected to fall slightly outside the top 100 in the next update. Maintaining that threshold remains a stated target, particularly within the framework of a farewell season that prioritises selective appearances over long-term accumulation.
Physical limits and competitive standards
Wawrinka has been explicit in describing the physical reality behind his final season. His comments point to a player still capable of competing at a reasonable level in isolated matches, but no longer able to sustain the demands of the tour across extended periods.
He described his condition in mechanical terms, noting that while there is still “enough for the year,” the broader capacity required to maintain consistency at a high level is no longer present. The emphasis has shifted towards managing energy and choosing moments carefully rather than pursuing rankings or deep runs as primary objectives.
“There’s still enough for the year, but it’s true that, in the engine, there isn’t what’s needed to keep doing everything I’ve been doing — especially if we want to stay at a decent level.”
Despite that, his internal standards remain unchanged. Wawrinka continues to frame participation around performance quality, indicating that he would rather withdraw than compete below his expectations — a principle that has defined much of his career.
“Of course, the pleasure is always there. Otherwise, I simply wouldn’t be here. First of all, out of respect for myself, I’ve always given my best. But when I don’t feel like it or feel I’m not performing at my maximum, I prefer to retire or simply not play tournaments.”
One last objective in Monte-Carlo
Within that context, the potential meeting with Alcaraz stands out as a specific and realistic objective. Unlike abstract legacy discussions, this is a concrete scenario shaped directly by the draw — one match away, contingent on his opening performance against Báez.
Wawrinka has followed Alcaraz’s rise closely and positions him as a benchmark for the current level of the sport. The absence of a previous meeting between the two adds weight to the possibility, particularly given the overlap between the final phase of one career and the peak of another.
“I’ve been saying it for years: I dream of playing against him. If it could be here, it would be magical. He’s one of the few I’ve never played. What he does on court seems exceptional to me. He takes tennis to another level. As an athlete, being able to face him in an official match would be an incredible opportunity.”
At the same time, Wawrinka has deliberately avoided structuring his post-career plans. While he acknowledges having considered life after tennis for years, he has chosen to postpone any decisions until his final season concludes, keeping his focus limited to the present.
“I’ve been thinking for ten years about what to do next. There are so many things I want to do, so many opportunities — I’ve opened many doors for that. But since I decided this would be my last year, I’ve put everything aside, closed everything. I want to finish the year without planning anything. First, we’ll relax. We’ll go back to Switzerland, and then we’ll see.”
Monte-Carlo, then, is not framed as a final push for results, but as a controlled step within a defined ending. The possibility of facing Alcaraz does not alter that trajectory, but it offers a clear, immediate objective — one that aligns with the competitive standards Wawrinka has maintained throughout his career.
Cristhián AvilaTennis Journalist
Cristhián Ávila is a tennis journalist based in Santiago, Chile, and has been part of the TennisUpToDate team since early 2023. He covers the ATP and WTA Tours as well as all four Grand Slams, producing breaking news, match reports, analysis, and regular liveblogs from major tournaments.
His reporting combines statistical analysis with clear explanation, helping readers understand tactical developments, player form, and broader storylines across the tour. Working fluently in both Spanish and English, Cristhián collaborates with an international editorial team and contributes to comprehensive global coverage. As part of his work, he has conducted interviews and media interactions with leading figures in the sport, including Caroline Wozniacki and John McEnroe.
In his journalism, Cristhián places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. His coverage is grounded in research, context, and direct engagement with professional tennis.
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Illness? Sure, sick over the fact she's run out of legit coaches. Also, perhaps another bout of allergies to 'work' and instruction.
- Two major problems with sports (and Life) in today's world... 1. Self-imposed "experts" like Gilbert, Clijsters, and Stubbs can't keep their nasty opinions and rumors to themselves. They feel a need to talk about things they have no relation to, nor a clue. 2. People & anti-Social Media.
- Anyone else notice how general mental & physical fatigue is a major issue now, given WTA's ignorant refusal to consider the stress of their idiotic scheduling and additional demands??
- What a load of bullshit. Artur Szostaczko failed to mention that he didn't get hired!!
- Almost condescending. BTW: That was another anti-climactic Final compared to several of the excellent pre-Final matches.
- Sounds like maybe a mental health break? Miss her on the tour. My favorite American female player. Hurry back Emma!
- Why are microphones even allowed in front of the coaching boxes??? In this age of hi-tech, whatever is heard (strategy or otherwise) can instantly be relayed to any given opponent. How and why did WTA decide to slip this past everyone? Also, these strategic placements of mic's is obvious stupidity initiating a commentator's personal decision to expound upon -- and apologize for -- foul language, etc., when a player or team member curses, etc. Then media pounces upon every off-color phrase or word in their sensationalistic "news coverage". This practice of literally -- and openly -- eavesdropping needs to stop!!
- So she actually CAN think clearly! If she wants to play tennis, make it a priority. Learn from Life choices (like having a kid with her rapper ex). Today's game is a grueling exercise in Humility if one is not fully dedicated; or does not have the time to do The Work. Raducanu is a shining example of someone with the talent but lacks the drive, attitude, and/or devotion it takes to maintain 100% capacity of everything the Tour demands.
- It's as if troubled 'Condescending Collins' is competing with The Williams' for the daily spotlight. Some just do not know when to quit. Go fix yourselves and stop informing the public of your personal problems. The general public has their own issues in Life.
- Coach Macci and Martina Navratilova are seemingly the only reasonable voices coming out of the tennis circuit in regards to Iga at the moment. People like Stubbs, Gilbert, and anti-Social Media dwellers have very little or nothing to offer. What they are indeed is... predictable. Why certain media think their input is of value is a mystery. Perhaps easy filler for their publications? Media, in general, could/should consider their poor choices and lazy habits of running to the Loudest Mouths for "expert advice". Certain Internet 'news sources' might do their own research and STOP COPYING & PASTING the first articles to hit the web with little-to-no editing or true journalism. As for Iga (and any athlete) they are not robots. They are Human Beings and Humans, as we all know, are not infallable. Leave the expert criticisms and "solutions" to these athletes and their teams. Disgruntled bettors and so-called "experts" are not a solution!
Loading