WTA Miami Open Round-Up Day Five | Coco Gauff rallies, Eala advances as Mboko vs Andreeva clash set
WTASunday, 22 March 2026 at 02:30
The Miami Open continued with third as several seeds and in-form players secured their places in the Round of 16. Coco Gauff recovered from a set down to reach the fourth round, while Alexandra Eala backed up her previous result with another straight-sets win. Victoria Mboko also progressed, setting up a notable fourth-round clash against Mirra Andreeva.
Elsewhere, Jessica Pegula advanced following a shortened match, Amanda Anisimova moved into the Round of 16 with a controlled performance, and Iva Jovic delivered one of the clearest upsets of the round. The draw now begins to take clearer shape heading into the latter stages of the tournament.
Coco Gauff recovers to defeat Alycia Parks in three sets
Coco Gauff 3-6, 6-0, 6-1 Alycia Parks
Coco Gauff defeated Alycia Parks 3-6, 6-0, 6-1 to reach the fourth round, overcoming an inconsistent start to take control of the match. Parks dictated much of the opening set with aggressive first-strike tennis, taking advantage of Gauff’s struggles on serve and closing the set with authority.
The match shifted early in the second set as Gauff adjusted her approach. Rather than forcing pace, she focused on extending rallies and targeting Parks’ backhand, forcing her opponent into longer exchanges. That change disrupted Parks’ rhythm and led to a sharp increase in unforced errors. A key moment came when Parks lost serve from 40-0 up, allowing Gauff to extend her momentum and take full control.
From that point, the match became one-directional. Gauff won 12 of the final 13 games, maintaining consistency from the baseline and avoiding unnecessary risks as Parks’ level dropped significantly.
The overall statistics reflected that shift. Gauff finished with six aces, won 69% of first-serve points and saved 14 of 16 break points, while also winning 67% of second-serve return points. Parks, despite a strong start, committed eight double faults and struggled to sustain her level once rallies extended. Gauff now advances to face Sorana Cirstea in the fourth round.
Match Statistics Alycia Parks vs. Coco Gauff
| Alycia Parks | VS | Coco Gauff |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 5 | Aces | 6 |
| 8 | Double Faults | 8 |
| 53% (42/79) | 1st Service Percentage | 60% (53/89) |
| 64% (27/42) | 1st Service Points Won | 68% (36/53) |
| 32% (12/37) | 2nd Service Points Won | 47% (17/36) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Saved | 88% (14/16) |
| 45% (5/11) | Service Games | 82% (9/11) |
| Return | ||
| 32% (17/53) | 1st Return Points Won | 36% (15/42) |
| 53% (19/36) | 2nd Return Points Won | 68% (25/37) |
Alexandra Eala maintains composure to overcome Linette
Alexandra Eala 6-3, 7-6(4) Magda Linette
Alexandra Eala defeated Magda Linette 6-3, 7-6(4) to reach the fourth round, delivering a composed performance built on consistency and control. After her previous high-profile win, Eala faced a more balanced contest and managed it effectively across two sets.
The first set was decided by a single break, with Eala maintaining control through steady baseline play and disciplined shot selection. Linette remained competitive and raised her level in the second set, particularly after a medical time-out, adjusting her positioning and increasing pressure on return.
That led to a tighter second set, with Linette breaking back and briefly moving ahead. However, Eala responded well under pressure, holding serve at key moments to force a tiebreak. In the breaker, she maintained clarity and avoided errors, closing out the match in straight sets.
Across the match, Eala’s serving was the foundation of her performance. She won 72% of first-serve points and 75% on second serve, while holding 10 of 11 service games. Her ability to stay consistent without overplaying proved decisive. She now advances to face Karolina Muchova in the fourth round.
Match Statistics Alexandra Eala vs. Magda Linette
| Alexandra Eala | VS | Magda Linette |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 1 | Aces | 1 |
| 2 | Double Faults | 2 |
| 61% (39/64) | 1st Service Percentage | 56% (37/66) |
| 72% (28/39) | 1st Service Points Won | 73% (27/37) |
| 76% (19/25) | 2nd Service Points Won | 52% (15/29) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Points Saved | 60% (3/5) |
| 91% (10/11) | Service Games | 80% (8/10) |
| Return | ||
| 27% (10/37) | 1st Return Points Won | 28% (11/39) |
| 48% (14/29) | 2nd Return Points Won | 24% (6/25) |
Victoria Mboko sets up Andreeva clash with controlled win
Victoria Mboko defeated Anastasia Zakharova 6-1, 7-5 to advance to the fourth round, combining early dominance with composure in the closing stages. The Canadian took control immediately, dictating play in the opening set and building a clear advantage with aggressive baseline play.
The second set presented a different challenge. Zakharova improved her level on serve and kept the score close, extending rallies and limiting errors. The set remained on serve through 5-5, requiring Mboko to manage a more balanced phase of the match.
Mboko handled that situation effectively. She stayed patient, avoided forcing the pace and waited for the opportunity to break late in the set. After securing the break, she served out the match without difficulty.
Her overall performance was anchored by strong serving. Mboko landed 73% of first serves, won 76% of those points and held all 10 of her service games, saving all three break points faced. Despite a few double faults, she maintained control throughout. She now moves into the fourth round, where she will face Mirra Andreeva.
Match Statistics Anastasia Zakharova vs. Victoria Mboko
| Anastasia Zakharova | VS | Victoria Mboko |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 1 | Aces | 4 |
| 4 | Double Faults | 5 |
| 68% (46/68) | 1st Service Percentage | 68% (42/62) |
| 61% (28/46) | 1st Service Points Won | 79% (33/42) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Service Points Won | 60% (12/20) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Saved | 100% (3/3) |
| 67% (6/9) | Service Games | 100% (10/10) |
| Return | ||
| 21% (9/42) | 1st Return Points Won | 39% (18/46) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Return Points Won | 55% (12/22) |
Mirra Andreeva turns match around to set Mboko fourth-round clash
Mirra Andreeva 7-6(4), 6-2 Marie Bouzkova
Mirra Andreeva defeated Marie Bouzkova 7-6(4), 6-2 to advance to the fourth round of the Miami Open, recovering from a difficult opening phase before taking control of the match. The eighth seed was tested early, particularly in a first set where Bouzkova created pressure and even held set points, but Andreeva remained composed to force a tiebreak and edge ahead.
The match shifted clearly after the opening set. Bouzkova had broken early and looked comfortable in extended rallies, but Andreeva gradually increased her consistency from the baseline and reduced unforced errors. Once she secured the first set, momentum carried into the second, where she broke early and began to dictate more of the exchanges. A sequence of six consecutive games, including three breaks, effectively decided the match as Bouzkova struggled to regain control.
Andreeva’s performance across the match was built on balance rather than dominance in one area. She won 67% of first-serve points and 48% on second serve, while also applying steady pressure on return, winning 64% of second-serve return points. Her ability to stay solid in longer rallies and capitalise on Bouzkova’s second serve proved decisive in the latter stages.
The win sends Andreeva into the fourth round, where she will face Victoria Mboko in one of the most intriguing matchups of the round, with both players arriving in strong form.
Match Statistics Mirra Andreeva vs. Marie Bouzkova
| Mirra Andreeva | VS | Marie Bouzkova |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 1 | Aces | 1 |
| 2 | Double Faults | 4 |
| 66% (49/74) | 1st Service Percentage | 63% (45/72) |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Service Points Won | 60% (27/45) |
| 48% (12/25) | 2nd Service Points Won | 37% (10/27) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Saved | 29% (2/7) |
| 70% (7/10) | Service Games | 50% (5/10) |
| Return | ||
| 40% (18/45) | 1st Return Points Won | 33% (16/49) |
| 63% (17/27) | 2nd Return Points Won | 52% (13/25) |
Jessica Pegula advances after early retirement from Jones
Jessica Pegula 6-1, 3-0, ret. Francesca Jones
Jessica Pegula advanced to the next round after Francesca Jones retired while trailing 6-1, 3-0. The match was cut short, but Pegula had already established clear control from the outset.
She dominated the opening set with efficient serving and consistent depth from the baseline, preventing Jones from establishing rhythm. The Brit struggled to hold serve and was unable to apply pressure in return games, allowing Pegula to dictate points comfortably.
At the start of the second set, Pegula secured another early break before Jones opted to retire, indicating she was unwell. The match ended after just 41 minutes.
Even within that limited time, Pegula’s level was clear. She won 93% of first-serve points, did not face a break point and consistently controlled return games, winning over half of points on both first and second-serve returns. She progresses with minimal time on court as the tournament moves forward.
Match Statistics Francesca Jones vs. Jessica Pegula
| Francesca Jones | VS | Jessica Pegula |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 1 | Aces | 5 |
| 0 | Double Faults | 0 |
| 68% (17/25) | 1st Service Percentage | 56% (14/25) |
| 29% (5/17) | 1st Service Points Won | 93% (13/14) |
| 38% (3/8) | 2nd Service Points Won | 64% (7/11) |
| 0% (0/4) | Break Points Saved | - (0/0) |
| 20% (1/5) | Service Games | 100% (5/5) |
| Return | ||
| 7% (1/14) | 1st Return Points Won | 71% (12/17) |
| 36% (4/11) | 2nd Return Points Won | 63% (5/8) |
Iva Jovic delivers dominant win over Paula Badosa
Iva Jovic 6-2, 6-1 Paula Badosa
Iva Jovic defeated Paula Badosa 6-2, 6-1 in one of the most one-sided matches of the round, controlling the contest through consistent returning and stable serving. After a competitive start, Jovic quickly established control as Badosa struggled to maintain level in her service games.
The key dynamic of the match was Badosa’s difficulty behind second serve. Jovic consistently stepped forward on return, taking time away and forcing errors. As the match progressed, Badosa was unable to recover structure, and her service games became increasingly vulnerable.
Jovic, by contrast, remained composed. She protected her own serve effectively and limited unforced errors, allowing her to extend her lead without fluctuations in momentum. The second set followed a similar pattern, with Jovic maintaining pressure and closing out the match comfortably.
The statistics underlined that contrast. Jovic won 88% of second-serve return points and converted five break opportunities, while Badosa won just 3 of 28 points behind her second serve and committed 10 double faults. Jovic’s balance between return pressure and service stability proved decisive in one of the most complete performances of the round.
Match Statistics Iva Jovic vs. Paula Badosa
| Iva Jovic | VS | Paula Badosa |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 2 | Aces | 3 |
| 0 | Double Faults | 10 |
| 71% (37/52) | 1st Service Percentage | 50% (29/58) |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Service Points Won | 72% (21/29) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Service Points Won | 14% (4/29) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Points Saved | 57% (8/14) |
| 86% (6/7) | Service Games | 25% (2/8) |
| Return | ||
| 28% (8/29) | 1st Return Points Won | 32% (12/37) |
| 86% (25/29) | 2nd Return Points Won | 47% (7/15) |
Amanda Anisimova controls match to reach Round of 16
Amanda Anisimova 6-4, 6-2 Yuliia Starodubtseva
Amanda Anisimova defeated Yuliia Starodubtseva 6-4, 6-2 to advance to the Round of 16, managing the match through consistent return pressure and controlled baseline play. While her serve fluctuated at times, she maintained overall control by consistently putting her opponent under pressure.
The opening set included a brief dip, as Anisimova failed to serve it out at 5-3. However, she immediately recovered by breaking again to secure the set, maintaining the overall balance of the match.
From there, she took firmer control in the second set, securing an early break and managing the lead without difficulty. Starodubtseva struggled to hold serve consistently and was unable to shift the momentum back in her favour.
Anisimova’s return game was the defining factor. She won 43% of first-return points and 76% of second-return points, repeatedly forcing errors and limiting her opponent’s options. She also won 78% of first-serve points, providing enough stability to avoid extended pressure on her own serve.
She now advances to face Belinda Bencic in the Round of 16 as the Miami Open moves deeper into its second week.
Match Statistics Amanda Anisimova vs. Yuliia Starodubtseva
| Amanda Anisimova | VS | Yuliia Starodubtseva |
|---|---|---|
| Service | ||
| 3 | Aces | 0 |
| 2 | Double Faults | 3 |
| 56% (32/57) | 1st Service Percentage | 68% (36/53) |
| 78% (25/32) | 1st Service Points Won | 58% (21/36) |
| 44% (11/25) | 2nd Service Points Won | 24% (4/17) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Points Saved | 38% (3/8) |
| 78% (7/9) | Service Games | 44% (4/9) |
| Return | ||
| 42% (15/36) | 1st Return Points Won | 22% (7/32) |
| 76% (13/17) | 2nd Return Points Won | 56% (14/25) |
claps 0visitors 0
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Sab has more disappointments to come. She's more or less been 'skating' by many of her opponents. Perhaps less Social Media, TV commercials, and photo-ops... otherwise those distractions will gaurantee a slide in ranking. Take that hint from the downfall of some of her colleagues.
- No kidding. Obviously this did not cross an editor's cubicle. Other than the mediocre grammar... there are more comma's in this mess than in 'War and Peace' !!
- Sketchy chair ump in Eala's match. I lost count how many times Siegemund walked to her box and talked between serves!!
- WTF is wrong with you people at WTA?? The Williams Freebies have gone on far too long!! WTA is resembling a certain Orange President who feels he is free to do as he pleases; and does so despite the fact the entire world knows this game of 'untouchables' is not going to end well for any of these Losers.
- Why is this article so poorly written, and seeming not proofread?
- Lena ends any "rivalry" talk today
- It's embarrassing how tennis media (especially this rag) refuses to give Doubles their due respect. Considering Siniakova's 11 hours of tennis in 3 days -- then winning the Indian Wells Doubles Title -- one would think an alleged tennis news source would highlight it.
- Yeah, Gilbert's a real expert on "mental" advice.
- Agree or disagree with whatever personal deterrents and/or denials exist in Emma World... one thing no one can argue is... she has wasted her most important period of development in tennis. It's a shame her Nanny(s) never taught her how to work well with others -- including those darn coaches always "telling me what to do".
- Rybakina could have finished that guy off... but he tucked his tail and quit.
Loading